Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) · Facelift 2023
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) · Facelift 2023 GLA 200dvsMercedes-Benz GLB (X247) · Facelift 2023 GLB 200d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GLB (X247) · Facelift 2023
GLB 200d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h9.1 s
- Fastest top speed205 km/h127 mph
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,640 kg3,616 lb
- Best power-to-weight91 hp/t68 kW/t10.9 kg/hp
- Best performance score41/100
- Best economy score90/100
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 200d
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range852 km530 mi
- Largest trunk570 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,640kg3,616lb | 1,655kg3,649lb |
| Gross weight | 2,215kg4,883lb | 2,230kg4,916lb |
| Top speed | 205 km/h 127 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 90.5s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated | 88.6s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 9.1s | 9.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 70.0s Calculated | 73.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.6s Calculated | 8.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.6s Calculated | 16.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 91hp/t68kW/t41hp/1000 lb Calculated | 91hp/t68kW/t41hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 195Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated | 193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 823km511mi Calculated | 852km530mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,950cc119cu in | 1,950cc119cu in |
| Length | 4,412mm174in | 4,634mm182in |
| Width | 1,834mm72in | 1,834mm72in |
| Height | 1,616mm64in | 1,697mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,729mm107in | 2,829mm111in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,604mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,606mm63in | 1,604mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 143mm6in | 135mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 427L | 570L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,422L | 1,805L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 52L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200d: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 200d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 3,400-4,400 rpm | 1,400-3,200 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d | 3,400-4,400 rpm | 1,400-3,200 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.6 s | 8.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 9.1 s | 9.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 70.0 s | 73.6 s |
| Top speed | 205 km/h 127 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 10.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.9 s | 14.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.6 s | 16.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 137 km/h 85 mph | 137 km/h 85 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 150 hp 112 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d | 150 hp 112 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d | 204 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 9.1 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d | 9.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200d and Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 200d: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 91 hp/t 68 kW/t 10.9 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d | 91 hp/t 68 kW/t 11.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 823 km 511 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d | 852 km 530 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 150 hp 112 kW | 9.1 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d | 150 hp 112 kW | 9.2 s | 204 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 9.1 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 9.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 91 hp/t 68 kW/t 10.9 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d | 91 hp/t 68 kW/t 11.0 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 9.1 s | 9.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 205 km/h 127 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 823 km 511 mi | 852 km 530 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 427 L 15.1 cu ft | 570 L 20.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 91 hp/t 68 kW/t 10.9 kg/hp | 91 hp/t 68 kW/t 11.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200d | Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 10.67 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 1,601 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200d
- Is 15 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 200d
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 30 km (19 mi) more estimated range
- Has 143 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























