Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200dvsMercedes-Benz GLB (X247) · Facelift 2023 GLB 200d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GLB (X247) · Facelift 2023
GLB 200d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200d 1951 cc
- Quickest 0-100 km/h9.0 s
- Fastest top speed204 km/h127 mph
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,605 kg3,538 lb
- Best power-to-weight93 hp/t70 kW/t10.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,040 km646 mi
- Largest trunk570 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score42/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200d1951 cc | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d1950 cc |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,605kg3,538lb | 1,655kg3,649lb |
| Gross weight | 2,195kg4,839lb | 2,230kg4,916lb |
| Top speed | 204 km/h 127 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 85.2s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph Calculated | 88.6s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 9.0s | 9.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 70.8s Calculated | 73.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.5s Calculated | 8.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 16.5s Calculated | 16.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 93hp/t70kW/t42hp/1000 lb Calculated | 91hp/t68kW/t41hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated | 193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,040km646mi Calculated | 852km530mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,951cc119cu in | 1,950cc119cu in |
| Length | 4,634mm182in | 4,634mm182in |
| Width | 1,834mm72in | 1,834mm72in |
| Height | 1,662mm65in | 1,697mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,829mm111in | 2,829mm111in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,604mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,606mm63in | 1,604mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 135mm5in | 135mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 570L | 570L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,805L | 1,805L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 52L | 52L |
| CO2 emissions | 133g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200d 1951 cc: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 200d 1950 cc: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200d1951 cc | 3,400-4,440 rpm | 1,400-2,600 rpm | 4,690 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d1950 cc | 3,400-4,400 rpm | 1,400-3,200 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200d1951 cc | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d1950 cc |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.5 s | 8.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 9.0 s | 9.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 70.8 s | 73.6 s |
| Top speed | 204 km/h 127 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 10.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.9 s | 14.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.5 s | 16.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 138 km/h 86 mph | 137 km/h 85 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200d1951 cc | 150 hp 112 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d1950 cc | 150 hp 112 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200d1951 cc | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d1950 cc | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200d1951 cc | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d1950 cc | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200d1951 cc | 204 km/h 127 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d1950 cc | 204 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200d1951 cc | 9.0 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d1950 cc | 9.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200d 1951 cc and Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 200d 1950 cc: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200d1951 cc | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d1950 cc | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200d 1951 cc and Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 200d 1950 cc: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200d1951 cc | 93 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.7 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d1950 cc | 91 hp/t 68 kW/t 11.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200d1951 cc | 1,040 km 646 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d1950 cc | 852 km 530 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200d1951 cc | 150 hp 112 kW | 9.0 s | 204 km/h 127 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d1950 cc | 150 hp 112 kW | 9.2 s | 204 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200d1951 cc |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d1950 cc |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200d1951 cc |
| 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d1950 cc |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200d 1951 cc is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200d1951 cc | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 9.0 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d1950 cc | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 9.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200d1951 cc | 93 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.7 kg/hp | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d1950 cc | 91 hp/t 68 kW/t 11.0 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200d1951 cc | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d1950 cc | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 9.0 s | 9.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 204 km/h 127 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,040 km 646 mi | 852 km 530 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 133 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 570 L 20.1 cu ft | 570 L 20.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 93 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.7 kg/hp | 91 hp/t 68 kW/t 11.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200d 1951 cc | Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 200d 1950 cc |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.75 LC100 km | 10.67 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.08 LC100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 750 L198 US gal165 UK gal | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,313 LC/year | 1,601 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200d 1951 cc
- Is 50 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 188 km (117 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 200d 1950 cc
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























