Car comparison

Ford Puma · Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoostvsMini Countryman (U25) D 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford Puma · Facelift 2024

1.0 EcoBoost

155 hp999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-present
VS

Mini Countryman (U25)

D 2.0

150 hp1995 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mini Countryman (U25) D 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.5 s
  • Highest torque
    360 Nm
    266 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.8 L/100 km
    49.0 mpg US
    58.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    938 km
    583 mi
  • Best overall score
    56/100
  • Best performance score
    44/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100
  • Best practicality score
    82/100

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Fastest top speed
    210 km/h
    130 mph Unrestricted
    200 km/h
    124 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    155 hp
    116 kW
  • Lightest
    1,293 kg
    2,851 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    120 hp/t
    89 kW/t
    8.3 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    456 L

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostMiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0
Power
155hp116kW
150hp112kW
Torque
240Nm177lb-ft
360Nm266lb-ft
Curb weight
1,293kg2,851lb
1,620kg3,571lb
Gross weight
1,835kg4,045lb
2,155kg4,751lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
208 km/h
129 mph
To 99% top speed
80.9s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
88.6s99% target: 206 km/h / 128 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.7s
8.5s
0-200 km/h
50.6s
Calculated
58.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.2s
Calculated
8.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.3s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
93hp/t69kW/t42hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
186Nm/t124lb-ft/ton
Calculated
222Nm/t149lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
667km414mi
Calculated
938km583mi
Calculated
Displacement
999cc61cu in
1,995cc122cu in
Length
4,186mm165in
4,444mm175in
Width
1,805mm71in
1,843mm73in
Height
1,550mm61in
1,661mm65in
Wheelbase
2,588mm102in
2,692mm106in
Front track
1,567mm62in
-
Rear track
1,526mm60in
-
Ground clearance
163mm6in
-
Trunk volume
456L
450L
Max trunk volume
1,216L
1,450L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
42L
45L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoostMini Countryman (U25) D 2.0PowerTorque
  • Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
  • Mini Countryman (U25) D 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost6,000 rpm2,500 rpm6,250 rpm
MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.03,750-4,000 rpm1,500-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostMiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.2 s
8.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.7 s
8.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
50.6 s
58.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
208 km/h
129 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
7.1 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.7 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.8 s
13.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.3 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
142 km/h
88 mph
140 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
155 hp
116 kW
MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0
150 hp
112 kW

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost has 5 hp more than Mini Countryman (U25) D 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Mini Countryman (U25) D 2.0 and Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0
360 Nm
266 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
1,293 kg
2,851 lb
MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0
1,620 kg
3,571 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0
208 km/h
129 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost8.7 s
MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.08.5 s

Although Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost has more power, Mini Countryman (U25) D 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Countryman (U25) D 2.0 and Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Countryman (U25) D 2.0 and Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost: 1.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0
93 hp/t
69 kW/t
10.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
667 km
414 mi
MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0
938 km
583 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
155 hp
116 kW
8.7 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0
150 hp
112 kW
8.5 s
208 km/h
129 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
Power
155 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,186 mm
164.8 in
Height
1,550 mm
61.0 in
MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
208 km/h
129 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,444 mm
175.0 in
Height
1,661 mm
65.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
Power
155 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
208 km/h
129 mph
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK

Mini Countryman (U25) D 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
8.7 s
MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
8.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0
93 hp/t
69 kW/t
10.8 kg/hp
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostMiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0
Power
155 hp
116 kW
150 hp
112 kW
Torque
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
360 Nm
266 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.7 s
8.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
208 km/h
129 mph
Lightness
1,293 kg
2,851 lb
1,620 kg
3,571 lb
Fuel consumption
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,186 mm
164.8 in
Height
1,550 mm
61.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,444 mm
175.0 in
Height
1,661 mm
65.4 in
Range score
667 km
414 mi
938 km
583 mi
Trunk score
456 L
16.1 cu ft
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
93 hp/t
69 kW/t
10.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoostMini Countryman (U25) D 2.0
Consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.03 LC100 km8.40 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.74 LC100 mi13.52 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used945 L250 US gal208 UK gal720 L190 US gal158 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,654 LC/year1,260 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Is 327 kg lighter
  • Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 6 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Mini Countryman (U25) D 2.0

  • Has 120 Nm more
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 271 km (168 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost
Mini Countryman (U25) D 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.0 EcoBoost
1.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostvsFordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
D 2.0
Cooper D 2.0
VS
MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0vsMiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper D 2.0
1.0 EcoBoost
1.3 Turbo
VS
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostvsMitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
D 2.0
Cooper D 2.0
VS
MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0vsMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostvsCupraFormentorFacelift 20241.5 TSI
D 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0vsMiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6
1.0 EcoBoost
1.3 DIG-T
VS
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostvsNissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T
D 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0vsMiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6
1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI
D 2.0
1.4 TSI
VS
MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0vsVolkswagenTiguan III1.4 TSI
1.0 EcoBoost
1.3 TCe
VS
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostvsRenaultDuster IIFacelift 20241.3 TCe
1.0 EcoBoost
GLB 200d
VS
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d
Ford Puma · Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost vs Mini Countryman (U25) D 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster