Mini Countryman (R60)
Car comparison
Mini Countryman (R60) Cooper S 1.6vsMini Countryman (U25) D 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Countryman (U25)
D 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Countryman (U25) D 2.0
- Highest torque360 Nm266 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range938 km583 mi
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Mini Countryman (R60) Cooper S 1.6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Lightest1,380 kg3,042 lb
- Best power-to-weight133 hp/t99 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
- Best performance score47/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6 | MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 240Nm177lb-ft | 360Nm266lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,380kg3,042lb | 1,620kg3,571lb |
| Gross weight | 1,840kg4,057lb | 2,155kg4,751lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.4s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 88.6s99% target: 206 km/h / 128 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.5s Calculated | 58.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 93hp/t69kW/t42hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 174Nm/t116lb-ft/ton Calculated | 222Nm/t149lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 701km436mi Calculated | 938km583mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,598cc98cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,110mm162in | 4,444mm175in |
| Width | 1,789mm70in | 1,843mm73in |
| Height | 1,561mm61in | 1,661mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,595mm102in | 2,692mm106in |
| Front track | 1,525mm60in | - |
| Rear track | 1,551mm61in | - |
| Ground clearance | 149mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 350L | 450L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,170L | 1,450L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 47L | 45L |
| CO2 emissions | 157g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Countryman (R60) Cooper S 1.6: Power / Torque
- Mini Countryman (U25) D 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6 | 5,500 rpm | 1,600-5,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | 3,750-4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6 | MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.5 s | 58.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW |
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | 150 hp 112 kW |
Mini Countryman (R60) Cooper S 1.6 has 34 hp more than Mini Countryman (U25) D 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Countryman (U25) D 2.0 and Mini Countryman (R60) Cooper S 1.6: 34 hp (25 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6 | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6 | 1,380 kg 3,042 lb |
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | 208 km/h 129 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6 | 7.9 s |
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Countryman (R60) Cooper S 1.6 and Mini Countryman (U25) D 2.0: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Countryman (U25) D 2.0 and Mini Countryman (R60) Cooper S 1.6: 1.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | 93 hp/t 69 kW/t 10.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6 | 701 km 436 mi |
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | 938 km 583 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.9 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.5 s | 208 km/h 129 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6 |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Countryman (R60) Cooper S 1.6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | 93 hp/t 69 kW/t 10.8 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6 | MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,380 kg 3,042 lb | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 701 km 436 mi | 938 km 583 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 157 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 350 L 12.4 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 93 hp/t 69 kW/t 10.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Countryman (R60) Cooper S 1.6 | Mini Countryman (U25) D 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.73 LC100 km | 8.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,759 LC/year | 1,260 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Countryman (R60) Cooper S 1.6
- Has 34 hp more
- Is 240 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 41 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Mini Countryman (U25) D 2.0
- Has 120 Nm more
- Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 236 km (147 mi) more estimated range
- Has 100 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























