Volkswagen T-Roc I · Facelift 2022
Car comparison
Volkswagen T-Roc I · Facelift 2022 2.0 TSIvsFord Puma · Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Puma · Facelift 2024
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Fastest top speed218 km/h135 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight130 hp/t97 kW/t7.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range873 km542 mi
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score90/100
Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost
- Lightest1,315 kg2,899 lb
- Largest trunk456 L
- Best practicality score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 170hp127kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 248Nm183lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,456kg3,210lb | 1,315kg2,899lb |
| Gross weight | 2,040kg4,497lb | 1,850kg4,079lb |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 65.5s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated | 72.8s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.9s Calculated | 45.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 129hp/t96kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated | 189Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 873km542mi Calculated | 646km402mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 999cc61cu in |
| Length | 4,236mm167in | 4,226mm166in |
| Width | 1,819mm72in | - |
| Height | 1,582mm62in | 1,533mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,594mm102in | 2,588mm102in |
| Front track | 1,547mm61in | 1,567mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,552mm61in | 1,523mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 158mm6in | 152mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 392L | 456L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,237L | 1,216L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 42L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost | 5,750 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.9 s | 45.0 s |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost | 170 hp 127 kW |
Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI has 20 hp more than Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost.
The biggest power difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost and Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost | 248 Nm 183 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 1,456 kg 3,210 lb |
| FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost | 1,315 kg 2,899 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 6.8 s |
| FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost | 7.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI and Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
| FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 873 km 542 mi |
| FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost | 646 km 402 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 6.8 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost | 170 hp 127 kW | 7.4 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 170 hp 127 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 248 Nm 183 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,456 kg 3,210 lb | 1,315 kg 2,899 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 873 km 542 mi | 646 km 402 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 392 L 13.8 cu ft | 456 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI | Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.03 LC100 km | 11.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,654 LC/year | 1,706 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 72 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 227 km (141 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost
- Is 141 kg lighter
- Has 64 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























