Volkswagen Tiguan III
Car comparison
Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TDIvsVolkswagen T-Roc I · Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen T-Roc I · Facelift 2022
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TDI
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph
- Most powerful193 hp144 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range983 km611 mi
- Largest trunk652 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Lightest1,456 kg3,210 lb
- Best power-to-weight130 hp/t97 kW/t7.7 kg/hp
- Best performance score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI | VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 193hp144kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,843kg4,063lb | 1,456kg3,210lb |
| Gross weight | 2,330kg5,137lb | 2,040kg4,497lb |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 82.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 65.5s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.3s Calculated | 32.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated | 220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 983km611mi Calculated | 873km542mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,539mm179in | 4,236mm167in |
| Width | 1,842mm73in | 1,819mm72in |
| Height | 1,656mm65in | 1,582mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,594mm102in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,547mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,578mm62in | 1,552mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 158mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 652L | 392L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,650L | 1,237L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 154g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI | - | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 3,500 rpm |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI | VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.3 s | 32.9 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 92 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI | 193 hp 144 kW |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TDI has 3 hp more than Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TDI: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI | 1,843 kg 4,063 lb |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 1,456 kg 3,210 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI | 7.7 s |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 6.8 s |
Although Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TDI has more power, Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TDI: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI | 983 km 611 mi |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 873 km 542 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI | 193 hp 144 kW | 7.7 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 6.8 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI | VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 193 hp 144 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,843 kg 4,063 lb | 1,456 kg 3,210 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 983 km 611 mi | 873 km 542 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 154 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 652 L 23.0 cu ft | 392 L 13.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TDI | Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km | 11.03 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year | 1,654 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TDI
- Has 3 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 110 km (68 mi) more estimated range
- Has 260 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI
- Is 387 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























