Volkswagen Tiguan III
Car comparison
Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen T-Roc I · Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen T-Roc I · Facelift 2022
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TSI
- Fastest top speed229 km/h142 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Largest trunk652 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Lightest1,456 kg3,210 lb
- Best power-to-weight130 hp/t97 kW/t7.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range873 km542 mi
- Best economy score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,644kg3,624lb | 1,456kg3,210lb |
| Gross weight | 2,220kg4,894lb | 2,040kg4,497lb |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.7s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 65.5s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.7s Calculated | 32.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 195Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated | 220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 716km445mi Calculated | 873km542mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,539mm179in | 4,236mm167in |
| Width | 1,859mm73in | 1,819mm72in |
| Height | 1,656mm65in | 1,582mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,594mm102in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,547mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,578mm62in | 1,552mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 158mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 652L | 392L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,650L | 1,237L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | - | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.7 s | 32.9 s |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 95 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | 204 hp 152 kW |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TSI has 14 hp more than Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TSI: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | 1,644 kg 3,624 lb |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 1,456 kg 3,210 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | 7.1 s |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 6.8 s |
Although Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TSI has more power, Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TSI: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TSI: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | 716 km 445 mi |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 873 km 542 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.1 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 6.8 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,644 kg 3,624 lb | 1,456 kg 3,210 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 716 km 445 mi | 873 km 542 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 652 L 23.0 cu ft | 392 L 13.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TSI | Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.17 LC100 km | 11.03 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,126 LC/year | 1,654 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TSI
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 260 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI
- Is 188 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 157 km (98 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























