Car comparison

Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSIvsCupra Ateca · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cupra Terramar

1.5 TSI

177 hp1498 ccHybridFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2024-present
VS

Cupra Ateca · Facelift 2020

2.0 TSI

190 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2023-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.2 s
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,505 kg
    3,318 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    126 hp/t
    94 kW/t
    7.9 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    485 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best practicality score
    83/100

Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI

  • Fastest top speed
    215 km/h
    134 mph
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    0.5 L/100 km
    470.4 mpg US
    565.0 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    9,000 km
    5,592 mi
  • Best economy score
    100/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCupraTerramar1.5 TSICupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Power
177hp132kW
190hp142kW
Torque
250Nm184lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,829kg4,032lb
1,505kg3,318lb
Gross weight
2,420kg5,335lb
2,090kg4,608lb
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
To 99% top speed
78.5s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
70.2s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.3s
7.2s
0-200 km/h
40.9s
Calculated
40.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.9s
Calculated
6.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
0.5L/100 km470.4mpg US565.0mpg UK
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
97hp/t72kW/t44hp/1000 lb
Calculated
126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
137Nm/t91lb-ft/ton
Calculated
213Nm/t142lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
9,000km5,592mi
Calculated
655km407mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,498cc91cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,519mm178in
4,381mm172in
Width
1,869mm74in
1,841mm72in
Height
1,586mm62in
1,625mm64in
Wheelbase
2,681mm106in
2,630mm104in
Front track
1,590mm63in
1,572mm62in
Rear track
1,580mm62in
1,544mm61in
Trunk volume
450L
485L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
45L
55L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSICupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CupraTerramar1.5 TSI5,500-6,000 rpm1,500-4,000 rpm6,250 rpm
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI4,200-6,000 rpm1,500-4,100 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCupraTerramar1.5 TSICupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.9 s
6.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.3 s
7.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
40.9 s
40.8 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.9 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.8 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
150 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar1.5 TSI
177 hp
132 kW
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW

Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI has 13 hp more than Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI and Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 13 hp (10 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar1.5 TSI
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar1.5 TSI
1,829 kg
4,032 lb
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
1,505 kg
3,318 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar1.5 TSI
215 km/h
134 mph
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
212 km/h
132 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar1.5 TSI7.3 s
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI7.2 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar1.5 TSI
0.5 L/100 km
470.4 mpg US
565.0 mpg UK
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI and Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 7.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar1.5 TSI
97 hp/t
72 kW/t
10.3 kg/hp
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar1.5 TSI
9,000 km
5,592 mi
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
655 km
407 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CupraTerramar1.5 TSI
177 hp
132 kW
7.3 s
215 km/h
134 mph
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
7.2 s
212 km/h
132 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CupraTerramar1.5 TSI
Power
177 hp
132 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,519 mm
177.9 in
Height
1,586 mm
62.4 in
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
485 L
17.1 cu ft
Length
4,381 mm
172.5 in
Height
1,625 mm
64.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CupraTerramar1.5 TSI
Power
177 hp
132 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
0.5 L/100 km
470.4 mpg US
565.0 mpg UK
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CupraTerramar1.5 TSI
0.5 L/100 km
470.4 mpg US
565.0 mpg UK
7.3 s
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
7.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CupraTerramar1.5 TSI
97 hp/t
72 kW/t
10.3 kg/hp
0.5 L/100 km
470.4 mpg US
565.0 mpg UK
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCupraTerramar1.5 TSICupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Power
177 hp
132 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.3 s
7.2 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
Lightness
1,829 kg
4,032 lb
1,505 kg
3,318 lb
Fuel consumption
0.5 L/100 km
470.4 mpg US
565.0 mpg UK
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,519 mm
177.9 in
Height
1,586 mm
62.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
485 L
17.1 cu ft
Length
4,381 mm
172.5 in
Height
1,625 mm
64.0 in
Range score
9,000 km
5,592 mi
655 km
407 mi
Trunk score
450 L
15.9 cu ft
485 L
17.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
97 hp/t
72 kW/t
10.3 kg/hp
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCupra Terramar 1.5 TSICupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
Consumption0.5 L/100 km470.4 mpg US565 mpg UK8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km0.88 LC100 km14.70 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi1.41 LC100 mi23.66 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used75 L20 US gal16 UK gal1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal
Annual fuel cost131.25 LC/year2,205 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI

  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 7.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 8,345 km (5,185 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI

  • Has 13 hp more
  • Has 70 Nm more
  • Is 324 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 35 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI
Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.5 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar1.5 TSIvsCupraFormentor2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsCupraAteca2.0 TSI
1.5 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
CupraTerramar1.5 TSIvsCupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar1.5 TSIvsVolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsCupraTerramar2.0 TSI
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar1.5 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan III1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
VS
CupraTerramar1.5 TSIvsFordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TSI
40 TFSI
VS
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
1.5 TSI
GLB 220d
VS
CupraTerramar1.5 TSIvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220d
2.0 TSI
GLA 220
VS
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsVolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI
1.5 TSI
1.6 T-GDI
VS
CupraTerramar1.5 TSIvsHyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI
Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI vs Cupra Ateca · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster