Hyundai Kona II
Car comparison
Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDIvsCupra Terramar 1.5 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCupra Terramar
1.5 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Highest torque265 Nm195 lb-ft
- Lightest1,505 kg3,318 lb
- Best power-to-weight120 hp/t89 kW/t8.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk466 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score46/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Lowest combined fuel consumption0.5 L/100 km470.4 mpg US565.0 mpg UK
- Best estimated range9,000 km5,592 mi
- Best economy score100/100
Specification comparison
| Model | HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | CupraTerramar1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 177hp132kW |
| Torque | 265Nm195lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,505kg3,318lb | 1,829kg4,032lb |
| Gross weight | 1,930kg4,255lb | 2,420kg5,335lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.6s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 78.5s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.1s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 39.8s Calculated | 40.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.7s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 0.5L/100 km470.4mpg US565.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 97hp/t72kW/t44hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 176Nm/t118lb-ft/ton Calculated | 137Nm/t91lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 734km456mi Calculated | 9,000km5,592mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,598cc98cu in | 1,498cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,350mm171in | 4,519mm178in |
| Width | 1,825mm72in | 1,869mm74in |
| Height | 1,585mm62in | 1,586mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,660mm105in | 2,681mm106in |
| Front track | 1,591mm63in | 1,590mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,600mm63in | 1,580mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 170mm7in | - |
| Trunk volume | 466L | 450L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,300L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 47L | 45L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI: Power / Torque
- Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 5,500-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | CupraTerramar1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.7 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.1 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 39.8 s | 40.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 146 km/h 90 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 180 hp 134 kW |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 177 hp 132 kW |
Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI has 3 hp more than Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI and Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 1,829 kg 4,032 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 8.1 s |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 7.3 s |
Although Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI has more power, Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI and Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI and Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI: 5.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 97 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 734 km 456 mi |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 9,000 km 5,592 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.1 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 177 hp 132 kW | 7.3 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI |
| 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 97 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp | 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 177 hp 132 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.1 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb | 1,829 kg 4,032 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 734 km 456 mi | 9,000 km 5,592 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 466 L 16.5 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 97 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI | Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK | 0.5 L/100 km470.4 mpg US565 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.20 LC100 km | 0.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi | 1.41 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal | 75 L20 US gal16 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,680 LC/year | 131.25 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI
- Has 3 hp more
- Has 15 Nm more
- Is 324 kg lighter
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 16 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 5.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 8,266 km (5,136 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























