Car comparison

Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDIvsFord Puma · Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Hyundai Kona II

1.6 T-GDI

180 hp1598 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2025-present

Ford Puma · Facelift 2024

ST 1.0 EcoBoost

170 hp999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI

Fastest top speed
220 km/h
137 mph Unrestricted
210 km/h
130 mph Restricted
Most powerful
180 hp
134 kW
Highest torque
265 Nm
195 lb-ft
Lowest combined fuel consumption
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
Best estimated range
734 km
456 mi
Largest trunk
466 L
Best overall score
58/100
Best economy score
90/100
Best practicality score
82/100

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost

Quickest 0-100 km/h
7.4 s
Lightest
1,315 kg
2,899 lb
Best power-to-weight
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
Best performance score
47/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
Model	HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI	FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Power	180hp134kW	170hp127kW
Torque	265Nm195lb-ft	248Nm183lb-ft
Curb weight	1,505kg3,318lb	1,315kg2,899lb
Gross weight	1,930kg4,255lb	1,850kg4,079lb
Top speed	Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated	210 km/h 130 mph
To 99% top speed	84.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated	72.8s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated
0-100 km/h	8.1s	7.4s
0-200 km/h	39.8s Calculated	45.0s Calculated
0-60 mph	7.7s Calculated	7.0s Calculated
Fuel consumption	6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK	6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
Quarter mile	15.9s Calculated	15.4s Calculated
Power-to-weight	120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated	129hp/t96kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated
Torque-to-weight	176Nm/t118lb-ft/ton Calculated	189Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated
Estimated range	734km456mi Calculated	646km402mi Calculated
Displacement	1,598cc98cu in	999cc61cu in
Length	4,350mm171in	4,226mm166in
Width	1,825mm72in	-
Height	1,585mm62in	1,533mm60in
Wheelbase	2,660mm105in	2,588mm102in
Front track	1,591mm63in	1,567mm62in
Rear track	1,600mm63in	1,523mm60in
Ground clearance	170mm7in	152mm6in
Trunk volume	466L	456L
Max trunk volume	1,300L	1,216L
Doors	5	5
Seats	5	5
Fuel tank	47L	42L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDIFord Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoostPowerTorque

Dyno simulation data table
Vehicle	Peak power RPM	Peak torque RPM	Max engine speed
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI	6,000 rpm	1,500-4,500 rpm	6,250 rpm
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost	5,750 rpm	3,000 rpm	6,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
Metric	HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI	FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
	Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h	7.7 s	7.0 s
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph	8.1 s	7.4 s
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph	39.8 s	45.0 s
Top speed	Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited	210 km/h 130 mph
	Drag race simulation
60 ft 18 m	2.6 s	2.5 s
330 ft 101 m	6.9 s	6.6 s
1/8 mile 201 m	10.4 s	10.0 s
1000 ft 305 m	13.4 s	12.9 s
1/4 mile 402 m	15.9 s	15.4 s
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m	146 km/h 90 mph	148 km/h 92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI	180 hp 134 kW
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost	170 hp 127 kW

Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI has 10 hp more than Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost and Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI	265 Nm 195 lb-ft
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost	248 Nm 183 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI	1,505 kg 3,318 lb
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost	1,315 kg 2,899 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI	Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost	210 km/h 130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI	8.1 s
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost	7.4 s

Although Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI has more power, Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost and Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI	6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost	6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI	120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost	129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI	734 km 456 mi
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost	646 km 402 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
Vehicle	Power	Acceleration	Top speed
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI	180 hp 134 kW	8.1 s	Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost	170 hp 127 kW	7.4 s	210 km/h 130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Vehicle

Performance score

Practicality score

HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI

Power	180 hp 134 kW
0-100 km/h	8.1 s
Top speed Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	466 L 16.5 cu ft
Length	4,350 mm 171.3 in
Height	1,585 mm 62.4 in

FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost

Power	170 hp 127 kW
0-100 km/h	7.4 s
Top speed 210 km/h 130 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	456 L 16.1 cu ft
Length	4,226 mm 166.4 in
Height	1,533 mm 60.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Vehicle

Performance score

Fuel economy score

HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI

Power	180 hp 134 kW
0-100 km/h	8.1 s
Top speed Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph

6.4 L/100 km

36.8 mpg US

44.1 mpg UK

FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost

Power	170 hp 127 kW
0-100 km/h	7.4 s
Top speed 210 km/h 130 mph

6.5 L/100 km

36.2 mpg US

43.5 mpg UK

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Fuel consumption, L/100 km	0-100 km/h, s
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI	6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK	8.1 s
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost	6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK	7.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Power-to-weight, hp/t	Fuel consumption, L/100 km
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI	120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp	6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost	129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp	6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Vehicle

HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI

FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost

Power

180 hp

134 kW

170 hp

127 kW

Torque

265 Nm

195 lb-ft

248 Nm

183 lb-ft

Acceleration

8.1 s

7.4 s

Top speed

Unrestricted

220 km/h137 mph

Restricted

210 km/h130 mph

210 km/h

130 mph

Lightness

1,505 kg

3,318 lb

1,315 kg

2,899 lb

Fuel consumption

6.4 L/100 km

36.8 mpg US

44.1 mpg UK

6.5 L/100 km

36.2 mpg US

43.5 mpg UK

Practicality

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	466 L 16.5 cu ft
Length	4,350 mm 171.3 in
Height	1,585 mm 62.4 in

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	456 L 16.1 cu ft
Length	4,226 mm 166.4 in
Height	1,533 mm 60.4 in

Range score

734 km

456 mi

646 km

402 mi

Trunk score

466 L

16.5 cu ft

456 L

16.1 cu ft

Power-to-weight score

120 hp/t

89 kW/t

8.4 kg/hp

129 hp/t

96 kW/t

7.7 kg/hp

Overall

Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Average annual distanceDistance unitFuel price in your local currencyPrice unit

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
Vehicle	Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI	Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Consumption	6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK	6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km	11.20 LC100 km	11.38 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi	18.02 LC100 mi	18.31 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used	960 L254 US gal211 UK gal	975 L258 US gal214 UK gal
Annual fuel cost	1,680 LC/year	1,706 LC/year