Hyundai Kona II
Car comparison
Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDIvsAlfa Romeo Tonale · Facelift 2025 1.5 VGT
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Tonale · Facelift 2025
1.5 VGT
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.1 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Highest torque265 Nm195 lb-ft
- Lightest1,505 kg3,318 lb
- Best power-to-weight120 hp/t89 kW/t8.4 kg/hp
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score46/100
Alfa Romeo Tonale Facelift 2025 1.5 VGT
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range932 km579 mi
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | Alfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 160hp119kW |
| Torque | 265Nm195lb-ft | 240Nm177lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,505kg3,318lb | 1,525kg3,362lb |
| Gross weight | 1,930kg4,255lb | 2,135kg4,707lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 85.4s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.1s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 39.8s Calculated | 49.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.7s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 176Nm/t118lb-ft/ton Calculated | 157Nm/t105lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 734km456mi Calculated | 932km579mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,598cc98cu in | 1,469cc90cu in |
| Length | 4,350mm171in | 4,522mm178in |
| Width | 1,825mm72in | 1,841mm72in |
| Height | 1,585mm62in | 1,601mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,660mm105in | 2,636mm104in |
| Front track | 1,591mm63in | - |
| Rear track | 1,600mm63in | - |
| Ground clearance | 170mm7in | 156mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 466L | 500L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,300L | 1,550L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 47L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | Alfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.7 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.1 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 39.8 s | 49.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 146 km/h 90 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 180 hp 134 kW |
| Alfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT | 160 hp 119 kW |
Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI has 20 hp more than Alfa Romeo Tonale Facelift 2025 1.5 VGT.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Tonale Facelift 2025 1.5 VGT and Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb |
| Alfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT | 1,525 kg 3,362 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| Alfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT | 212 km/h 132 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 8.1 s |
| Alfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI and Alfa Romeo Tonale Facelift 2025 1.5 VGT: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Tonale Facelift 2025 1.5 VGT and Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 734 km 456 mi |
| Alfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT | 932 km 579 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.1 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| Alfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT | 160 hp 119 kW | 8.5 s | 212 km/h 132 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
| Alfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | Alfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 160 hp 119 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.1 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb | 1,525 kg 3,362 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 734 km 456 mi | 932 km 579 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 466 L 16.5 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI | Alfa Romeo Tonale Facelift 2025 1.5 VGT |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.20 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,680 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 25 Nm more
- Is 20 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Alfa Romeo Tonale Facelift 2025 1.5 VGT
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 198 km (123 mi) more estimated range
- Has 34 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























