Car comparison

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSIvsCupra Ateca · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cupra Terramar

2.0 TSI

204 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2024-present
VS

Cupra Ateca · Facelift 2020

2.0 TSI

190 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2023-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    225 km/h
    140 mph
  • Most powerful
    204 hp
    152 kW
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.0 L/100 km
    29.4 mpg US
    35.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    750 km
    466 mi
  • Largest trunk
    540 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best economy score
    85/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCupraTerramar2.0 TSICupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Power
204hp152kW
190hp142kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,665kg3,671lb
1,505kg3,318lb
Gross weight
2,280kg5,027lb
2,090kg4,608lb
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
To 99% top speed
77.1s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
70.2s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.1s
7.2s
0-200 km/h
32.7s
Calculated
40.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.7s
Calculated
6.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.1s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
123hp/t91kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton
Calculated
213Nm/t142lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
750km466mi
Calculated
655km407mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,519mm178in
4,381mm172in
Width
1,869mm74in
1,841mm72in
Height
1,586mm62in
1,625mm64in
Wheelbase
2,681mm106in
2,630mm104in
Front track
1,590mm63in
1,572mm62in
Rear track
1,580mm62in
1,544mm61in
Trunk volume
540L
485L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
55L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSICupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI4,500-6,000 rpm1,500-4,400 rpm6,250 rpm
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI4,200-6,000 rpm1,500-4,100 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCupraTerramar2.0 TSICupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.7 s
6.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.1 s
7.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
32.7 s
40.8 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.9 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.7 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.1 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
152 km/h
95 mph
150 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
204 hp
152 kW
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI has 14 hp more than Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: 14 hp (10 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
1,665 kg
3,671 lb
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
1,505 kg
3,318 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
225 km/h
140 mph
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
212 km/h
132 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI7.1 s
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI7.2 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI and Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
123 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
750 km
466 mi
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
655 km
407 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
204 hp
152 kW
7.1 s
225 km/h
140 mph
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
7.2 s
212 km/h
132 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,519 mm
177.9 in
Height
1,586 mm
62.4 in
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
485 L
17.1 cu ft
Length
4,381 mm
172.5 in
Height
1,625 mm
64.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
7.1 s
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
7.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
123 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCupraTerramar2.0 TSICupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Power
204 hp
152 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.1 s
7.2 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
Lightness
1,665 kg
3,671 lb
1,505 kg
3,318 lb
Fuel consumption
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,519 mm
177.9 in
Height
1,586 mm
62.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
485 L
17.1 cu ft
Length
4,381 mm
172.5 in
Height
1,625 mm
64.0 in
Range score
750 km
466 mi
655 km
407 mi
Trunk score
540 L
19.1 cu ft
485 L
17.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
123 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCupra Terramar 2.0 TSICupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
Consumption8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.00 LC100 km14.70 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.53 LC100 mi23.66 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,100 LC/year2,205 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI

  • Has 14 hp more
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 95 km (59 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 55 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest

Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI

  • Is 160 kg lighter
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI
Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsCupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsCupraAteca2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsCupraFormentor2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
S 2.0
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsMiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0
2.0 TSI
1.5 TSI
VS
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsCupraTerramar1.5 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
40 TFSI
VS
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsAUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
2.0 TSI
GLA 220
VS
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220
2.0 TSI
Standard Range 50 kWh
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsTeslaModel YStandard Range 50 kWh
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsVolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI vs Cupra Ateca · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster