Volkswagen T-Roc I · Facelift 2022
Car comparison
Volkswagen T-Roc I · Facelift 2022 2.0 TSIvsCupra Ateca · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCupra Ateca · Facelift 2020
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Fastest top speed218 km/h135 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,456 kg3,210 lb
- Best power-to-weight130 hp/t97 kW/t7.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range873 km542 mi
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score90/100
Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Largest trunk485 L
- Best practicality score83/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,456kg3,210lb | 1,505kg3,318lb |
| Gross weight | 2,040kg4,497lb | 2,090kg4,608lb |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 65.4s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated | 70.2s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.9s Calculated | 40.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated | 213Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 873km542mi Calculated | 655km407mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,236mm167in | 4,381mm172in |
| Width | 1,819mm72in | 1,841mm72in |
| Height | 1,582mm62in | 1,625mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,594mm102in | 2,630mm104in |
| Front track | 1,547mm61in | 1,572mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,552mm61in | 1,544mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 158mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 392L | 485L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,237L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.9 s | 40.8 s |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 1,456 kg 3,210 lb |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 212 km/h 132 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 6.8 s |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI and Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI and Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 2.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 873 km 542 mi |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 655 km 407 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 6.8 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.2 s | 212 km/h 132 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI | CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,456 kg 3,210 lb | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 873 km 542 mi | 655 km 407 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 392 L 13.8 cu ft | 485 L 17.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI | Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.03 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,654 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI
- Is 49 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 218 km (136 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Has 93 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























