Car comparison

Volkswagen T-Roc I · Facelift 2022 2.0 TSIvsCupra Ateca · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen T-Roc I · Facelift 2022

2.0 TSI

190 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2022-2025
VS

Cupra Ateca · Facelift 2020

2.0 TSI

190 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2023-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    218 km/h
    135 mph
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,456 kg
    3,210 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    130 hp/t
    97 kW/t
    7.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.3 L/100 km
    37.3 mpg US
    44.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    873 km
    542 mi
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSICupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Power
190hp142kW
190hp142kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,456kg3,210lb
1,505kg3,318lb
Gross weight
2,040kg4,497lb
2,090kg4,608lb
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
To 99% top speed
65.4s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph
Calculated
70.2s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.8s
7.2s
0-200 km/h
32.9s
Calculated
40.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.4s
Calculated
6.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
14.9s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton
Calculated
213Nm/t142lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
873km542mi
Calculated
655km407mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,236mm167in
4,381mm172in
Width
1,819mm72in
1,841mm72in
Height
1,582mm62in
1,625mm64in
Wheelbase
2,594mm102in
2,630mm104in
Front track
1,547mm61in
1,572mm62in
Rear track
1,552mm61in
1,544mm61in
Ground clearance
158mm6in
-
Trunk volume
392L
485L
Max trunk volume
1,237L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
55L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSICupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI4,200-6,000 rpm1,500-4,100 rpm6,250 rpm
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI4,200-6,000 rpm1,500-4,100 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSICupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.4 s
6.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.8 s
7.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
32.9 s
40.8 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.5 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.9 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
154 km/h
96 mph
150 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI
1,456 kg
3,210 lb
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
1,505 kg
3,318 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI
218 km/h
135 mph
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
212 km/h
132 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI and Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI and Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 2.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI
873 km
542 mi
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
655 km
407 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
6.8 s
218 km/h
135 mph
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
7.2 s
212 km/h
132 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
392 L
13.8 cu ft
Length
4,236 mm
166.8 in
Height
1,582 mm
62.3 in
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
485 L
17.1 cu ft
Length
4,381 mm
172.5 in
Height
1,625 mm
64.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
6.8 s
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
7.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSICupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.8 s
7.2 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
Lightness
1,456 kg
3,210 lb
1,505 kg
3,318 lb
Fuel consumption
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
392 L
13.8 cu ft
Length
4,236 mm
166.8 in
Height
1,582 mm
62.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
485 L
17.1 cu ft
Length
4,381 mm
172.5 in
Height
1,625 mm
64.0 in
Range score
873 km
542 mi
655 km
407 mi
Trunk score
392 L
13.8 cu ft
485 L
17.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSICupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
Consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.03 LC100 km14.70 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.74 LC100 mi23.66 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used945 L250 US gal208 UK gal1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,654 LC/year2,205 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI

  • Is 49 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 218 km (136 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI
Cupra Ateca 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Volkswagen T-Roc I · Facelift 2022 2.0 TSI vs Cupra Ateca · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster