Cupra Formentor · Facelift 2024
Car comparison
Cupra Formentor · Facelift 2024 2.0 TSIvsCupra Ateca · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCupra Ateca · Facelift 2020
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,500 kg3,307 lb
- Best power-to-weight136 hp/t101 kW/t7.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range705 km438 mi
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score86/100
Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Largest trunk485 L
- Best practicality score83/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,500kg3,307lb | 1,505kg3,318lb |
| Gross weight | 2,100kg4,630lb | 2,090kg4,608lb |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 68.0s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 70.2s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.6s Calculated | 40.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 136hp/t101kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 213Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated | 213Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 705km438mi Calculated | 655km407mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,451mm175in | 4,381mm172in |
| Width | 1,839mm72in | 1,841mm72in |
| Height | 1,528mm60in | 1,625mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,630mm104in |
| Front track | 1,585mm62in | 1,572mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,559mm61in | 1,544mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 420L | 485L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,505L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 4,500-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.6 s | 40.8 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 204 hp 152 kW |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI has 14 hp more than Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 212 km/h 132 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 6.7 s |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI and Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI and Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 705 km 438 mi |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 655 km 407 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 204 hp 152 kW | 6.7 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.2 s | 212 km/h 132 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 705 km 438 mi | 655 km 407 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | 485 L 17.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI | Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.65 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,048 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI
- Has 14 hp more
- Is 5 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 50 km (31 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Has 65 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























