Car comparison

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoostvsAUDI Q2L 35 TFSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford Puma

1.0 EcoBoost

155 hpGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSUV2019-2020
VS

AUDI Q2L

35 TFSI

150 hp1395 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Fastest top speed
    210 km/h
    130 mph Unrestricted
    200 km/h
    124 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    155 hp
    116 kW
  • Lightest
    1,205 kg
    2,657 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    129 hp/t
    96 kW/t
    7.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.5 L/100 km
    52.3 mpg US
    62.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    933 km
    580 mi
  • Largest trunk
    468 L
  • Best overall score
    55/100
  • Best performance score
    42/100
  • Best economy score
    95/100
  • Best practicality score
    82/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordPuma1.0 EcoBoostAUDIQ2L35 TFSI
Power
155hp116kW
150hp112kW
Torque
240Nm177lb-ft
250Nm184lb-ft
Curb weight
1,205kg2,657lb
1,405kg3,097lb
Gross weight
1,765kg3,891lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
200 km/h
124 mph
To 99% top speed
82.3s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
77.4s99% target: 198 km/h / 123 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
9.0s
8.7s
0-200 km/h
51.6s
Calculated
-
0-60 mph
8.5s
Calculated
8.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
16.5s
Calculated
16.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
129hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
107hp/t80kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
933km580mi
Calculated
820km509mi
Calculated
Displacement-
1,395cc85cu in
Length
4,207mm166in
4,236mm167in
Width
1,805mm71in
1,785mm70in
Height
1,538mm61in
1,548mm61in
Wheelbase
2,588mm102in
2,628mm103in
Front track-
1,543mm61in
Rear track-
1,546mm61in
Trunk volume
468L
347L
Max trunk volume
1,161L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
42L
50L
CO2 emissions
101g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoostAUDI Q2L 35 TFSIPowerTorque
  • Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
  • AUDI Q2L 35 TFSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost6,000 rpm1,750 rpm6,250 rpm
AUDIQ2L35 TFSI5,000-6,000 rpm1,750-3,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordPuma1.0 EcoBoostAUDIQ2L35 TFSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.5 s
8.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
9.0 s
8.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
51.6 s
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
200 km/h
124 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.3 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.9 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
14.0 s
13.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.5 s
16.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
141 km/h
87 mph
140 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
155 hp
116 kW
AUDIQ2L35 TFSI
150 hp
112 kW

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost has 5 hp more than AUDI Q2L 35 TFSI.

The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q2L 35 TFSI and Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
AUDIQ2L35 TFSI
250 Nm
184 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
1,205 kg
2,657 lb
AUDIQ2L35 TFSI
1,405 kg
3,097 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
AUDIQ2L35 TFSI
200 km/h
124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost9.0 s
AUDIQ2L35 TFSI8.7 s

Although Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost has more power, AUDI Q2L 35 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q2L 35 TFSI and Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
AUDIQ2L35 TFSI
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost and AUDI Q2L 35 TFSI: 1.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
AUDIQ2L35 TFSI
107 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
933 km
580 mi
AUDIQ2L35 TFSI
820 km
509 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
155 hp
116 kW
9.0 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
AUDIQ2L35 TFSI
150 hp
112 kW
8.7 s
200 km/h
124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
Power
155 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
468 L
16.5 cu ft
Length
4,207 mm
165.6 in
Height
1,538 mm
60.6 in
AUDIQ2L35 TFSI
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
347 L
12.3 cu ft
Length
4,236 mm
166.8 in
Height
1,548 mm
60.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
Power
155 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
AUDIQ2L35 TFSI
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
9.0 s
AUDIQ2L35 TFSI
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
8.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
AUDIQ2L35 TFSI
107 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordPuma1.0 EcoBoostAUDIQ2L35 TFSI
Power
155 hp
116 kW
150 hp
112 kW
Torque
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
Acceleration
9.0 s
8.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
200 km/h
124 mph
Lightness
1,205 kg
2,657 lb
1,405 kg
3,097 lb
Fuel consumption
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
468 L
16.5 cu ft
Length
4,207 mm
165.6 in
Height
1,538 mm
60.6 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
347 L
12.3 cu ft
Length
4,236 mm
166.8 in
Height
1,548 mm
60.9 in
Range score
933 km
580 mi
820 km
509 mi
CO2 score
101 g/km
-
Trunk score
468 L
16.5 cu ft
347 L
12.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
107 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord Puma 1.0 EcoBoostAUDI Q2L 35 TFSI
Consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km7.88 LC100 km10.67 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi12.67 LC100 mi17.18 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used675 L178 US gal148 UK gal915 L242 US gal201 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,181 LC/year1,601 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Is 200 kg lighter
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 114 km (71 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 121 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h

AUDI Q2L 35 TFSI

  • Has 10 Nm more
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost
AUDI Q2L 35 TFSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.0 EcoBoost
1.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsFordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
35 TFSI
35 TDI
VS
AUDIQ2L35 TFSIvsAUDIQ235 TDI
1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI
35 TFSI
35 TDI
VS
AUDIQ2L35 TFSIvsAUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TDI
1.0 EcoBoost
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
35 TFSI
35 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ2L35 TFSIvsAUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSI
1.0 EcoBoost
Cooper D 2.0
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
35 TFSI
1.4 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ2L35 TFSIvsAUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20141.4 TFSI
1.0 EcoBoost
1.2 PureTech
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsPeugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech
35 TFSI
40 TDI
VS
AUDIQ2L35 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
35 TFSI
35 TDI
VS
AUDIQ2L35 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI
1.0 EcoBoost
280TSI
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenTacqua280TSI
Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost vs AUDI Q2L 35 TFSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster