Car comparison

Ford Puma · Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoostvsFord Puma 1.0 EcoBoost

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford Puma · Facelift 2024

1.0 EcoBoost

155 hp999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-present
VS

Ford Puma

1.0 EcoBoost

155 hpGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSUV2019-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Manual

  • Lightest
    1,205 kg
    2,657 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    129 hp/t
    96 kW/t
    7.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.5 L/100 km
    52.3 mpg US
    62.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    933 km
    580 mi
  • Largest trunk
    468 L
  • Best economy score
    95/100
  • Best practicality score
    82/100

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost Automatic

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    210 km/h
    130 mph Unrestricted
    200 km/h
    124 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    155 hp
    116 kW
  • Highest torque
    240 Nm
    177 lb-ft
  • Best overall score
    55/100
  • Best performance score
    43/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostAutomaticFordPuma1.0 EcoBoostManual
Power
155hp116kW
155hp116kW
Torque
240Nm177lb-ft
240Nm177lb-ft
Curb weight
1,293kg2,851lb
1,205kg2,657lb
Gross weight
1,835kg4,045lb
1,765kg3,891lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
80.9s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
82.3s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.7s
9.0s
0-200 km/h
50.6s
Calculated
51.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.2s
Calculated
8.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.3s
Calculated
16.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
129hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
186Nm/t124lb-ft/ton
Calculated
199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
667km414mi
Calculated
933km580mi
Calculated
Displacement
999cc61cu in
-
Length
4,186mm165in
4,207mm166in
Width
1,805mm71in
1,805mm71in
Height
1,550mm61in
1,538mm61in
Wheelbase
2,588mm102in
2,588mm102in
Front track
1,567mm62in
-
Rear track
1,526mm60in
-
Ground clearance
163mm6in
-
Trunk volume
456L
468L
Max trunk volume
1,216L
1,161L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
42L
42L
CO2 emissions-
101g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost AutomaticFord Puma 1.0 EcoBoost ManualPowerTorque
  • Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost Automatic: Power / Torque
  • Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Manual: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostAutomatic6,000 rpm2,500 rpm6,250 rpm
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostManual6,000 rpm1,750 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostAutomaticFordPuma1.0 EcoBoostManual
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.2 s
8.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.7 s
9.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
50.6 s
51.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
7.1 s
7.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.7 s
10.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.8 s
14.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.3 s
16.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
142 km/h
88 mph
141 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostAutomatic
155 hp
116 kW
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostManual
155 hp
116 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostAutomatic
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostManual
240 Nm
177 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostAutomatic
1,293 kg
2,851 lb
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostManual
1,205 kg
2,657 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostAutomatic
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostManual
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost Automatic and Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Manual: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostAutomatic
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostManual
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Manual and Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost Automatic: 1.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostAutomatic
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostManual
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostAutomatic
667 km
414 mi
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostManual
933 km
580 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostAutomatic
155 hp
116 kW
8.7 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostManual
155 hp
116 kW
9.0 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostAutomatic
Power
155 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,186 mm
164.8 in
Height
1,550 mm
61.0 in
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostManual
Power
155 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
468 L
16.5 cu ft
Length
4,207 mm
165.6 in
Height
1,538 mm
60.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostAutomatic
Power
155 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostManual
Power
155 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost Automatic is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostAutomatic
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
8.7 s
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostManual
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
9.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostAutomatic
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostManual
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostAutomaticFordPuma1.0 EcoBoostManual
Power
155 hp
116 kW
155 hp
116 kW
Torque
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.7 s
9.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
1,293 kg
2,851 lb
1,205 kg
2,657 lb
Fuel consumption
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,186 mm
164.8 in
Height
1,550 mm
61.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
468 L
16.5 cu ft
Length
4,207 mm
165.6 in
Height
1,538 mm
60.6 in
Range score
667 km
414 mi
933 km
580 mi
CO2 score
-
101 g/km
Trunk score
456 L
16.1 cu ft
468 L
16.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost AutomaticFord Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Manual
Consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.03 LC100 km7.88 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.74 LC100 mi12.67 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used945 L250 US gal208 UK gal675 L178 US gal148 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,654 LC/year1,181 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Manual

  • Is 88 kg lighter
  • Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 267 km (166 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 12 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost
Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Ford Puma · Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost vs Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost - car comparison - FastVsFaster