Ford Puma · Facelift 2024
Car comparison
Ford Puma · Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoostvsFord Puma 1.0 EcoBoost
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Puma
1.0 EcoBoost
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Manual
- Lightest1,205 kg2,657 lb
- Best power-to-weight129 hp/t96 kW/t7.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range933 km580 mi
- Largest trunk468 L
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost Automatic
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.7 s
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph Unrestricted200 km/h124 mph Restricted
- Most powerful155 hp116 kW
- Highest torque240 Nm177 lb-ft
- Best overall score55/100
- Best performance score43/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostAutomatic | FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostManual |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 155hp116kW | 155hp116kW |
| Torque | 240Nm177lb-ft | 240Nm177lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,293kg2,851lb | 1,205kg2,657lb |
| Gross weight | 1,835kg4,045lb | 1,765kg3,891lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 80.9s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 82.3s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.7s | 9.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 50.6s Calculated | 51.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.2s Calculated | 8.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.3s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 129hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 186Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 667km414mi Calculated | 933km580mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 999cc61cu in | - |
| Length | 4,186mm165in | 4,207mm166in |
| Width | 1,805mm71in | 1,805mm71in |
| Height | 1,550mm61in | 1,538mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,588mm102in | 2,588mm102in |
| Front track | 1,567mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,526mm60in | - |
| Ground clearance | 163mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 456L | 468L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,216L | 1,161L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 42L | 42L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 101g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost Automatic: Power / Torque
- Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Manual: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostAutomatic | 6,000 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostManual | 6,000 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostAutomatic | FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostManual |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.2 s | 8.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.7 s | 9.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 50.6 s | 51.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 14.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.3 s | 16.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 142 km/h 88 mph | 141 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostAutomatic | 155 hp 116 kW |
| FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostManual | 155 hp 116 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostAutomatic | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
| FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostManual | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostAutomatic | 1,293 kg 2,851 lb |
| FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostManual | 1,205 kg 2,657 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostAutomatic | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostManual | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostAutomatic | 8.7 s |
| FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostManual | 9.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost Automatic and Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Manual: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostAutomatic | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostManual | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Manual and Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost Automatic: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostAutomatic | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
| FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostManual | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostAutomatic | 667 km 414 mi |
| FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostManual | 933 km 580 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostAutomatic | 155 hp 116 kW | 8.7 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostManual | 155 hp 116 kW | 9.0 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostAutomatic |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostManual |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostAutomatic |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostManual |
| 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost Automatic is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostAutomatic | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
| FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostManual | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 9.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostAutomatic | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostManual | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostAutomatic | FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostManual | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 155 hp 116 kW | 155 hp 116 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.7 s | 9.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,293 kg 2,851 lb | 1,205 kg 2,657 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 667 km 414 mi | 933 km 580 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 101 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 456 L 16.1 cu ft | 468 L 16.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost Automatic | Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Manual |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK | 4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.03 LC100 km | 7.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi | 12.67 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal | 675 L178 US gal148 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,654 LC/year | 1,181 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost Automatic
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Manual
- Is 88 kg lighter
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 267 km (166 mi) more estimated range
- Has 12 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























