Car comparison

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoostvsPeugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford Puma

1.0 EcoBoost

155 hpGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSUV2019-2020
VS

Peugeot 2008 II

1.2 PureTech

155 hp1199 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2019-2022

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Fastest top speed
    210 km/h
    130 mph Unrestricted
    200 km/h
    124 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    155 hp
    116 kW
  • Highest torque
    240 Nm
    177 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,205 kg
    2,657 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    129 hp/t
    96 kW/t
    7.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.5 L/100 km
    52.3 mpg US
    62.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.1 L/100 km
    57.4 mpg US
    68.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    101 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    933 km
    580 mi
  • Largest trunk
    468 L
  • Best economy score
    95/100
  • Best practicality score
    82/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordPuma1.0 EcoBoostPeugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech
Power
155hp116kW
155hp116kW
Torque
240Nm177lb-ft
240Nm177lb-ft
Curb weight
1,205kg2,657lb
1,205kg2,657lb
Gross weight
1,765kg3,891lb
1,748kg3,854lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
208 km/h
129 mph
To 99% top speed
82.3s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
73.4s99% target: 206 km/h / 128 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
9.0s
8.2s
0-200 km/h
51.6s
Calculated
49.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.5s
Calculated
7.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK
5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK
4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.5s
Calculated
16.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
129hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
129hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
933km580mi
Calculated
880km547mi
Calculated
Displacement-
1,199cc73cu in
Length
4,207mm166in
4,300mm169in
Width
1,805mm71in
1,770mm70in
Height
1,538mm61in
1,550mm61in
Wheelbase
2,588mm102in
2,605mm103in
Front track-
1,540mm61in
Rear track-
1,540mm61in
Trunk volume
468L
405L
Max trunk volume
1,161L
1,467L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
42L
44L
CO2 emissions
101g/km
114g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoostPeugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTechPowerTorque
  • Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
  • Peugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost6,000 rpm1,750 rpm6,250 rpm
Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech5,500 rpm1,750 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordPuma1.0 EcoBoostPeugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.5 s
7.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
9.0 s
8.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
51.6 s
49.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
208 km/h
129 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.3 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.9 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
14.0 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.5 s
16.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
141 km/h
87 mph
145 km/h
90 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
155 hp
116 kW
Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech
155 hp
116 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech
240 Nm
177 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
1,205 kg
2,657 lb
Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech
1,205 kg
2,657 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech
208 km/h
129 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost9.0 s
Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech8.2 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Peugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech and Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost and Peugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech: 0.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
933 km
580 mi
Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech
880 km
547 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
155 hp
116 kW
9.0 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech
155 hp
116 kW
8.2 s
208 km/h
129 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
Power
155 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
468 L
16.5 cu ft
Length
4,207 mm
165.6 in
Height
1,538 mm
60.6 in
Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech
Power
155 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
208 km/h
129 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
405 L
14.3 cu ft
Length
4,300 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,550 mm
61.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
Power
155 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech
Power
155 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
208 km/h
129 mph
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK

Peugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
9.0 s
Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK
8.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordPuma1.0 EcoBoostPeugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech
Power
155 hp
116 kW
155 hp
116 kW
Torque
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
Acceleration
9.0 s
8.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
208 km/h
129 mph
Lightness
1,205 kg
2,657 lb
1,205 kg
2,657 lb
Fuel consumption
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
468 L
16.5 cu ft
Length
4,207 mm
165.6 in
Height
1,538 mm
60.6 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
405 L
14.3 cu ft
Length
4,300 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,550 mm
61.0 in
Range score
933 km
580 mi
880 km
547 mi
CO2 score
101 g/km
114 g/km
Trunk score
468 L
16.5 cu ft
405 L
14.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord Puma 1.0 EcoBoostPeugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech
Consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km7.88 LC100 km8.75 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi12.67 LC100 mi14.08 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used675 L178 US gal148 UK gal750 L198 US gal165 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,181 LC/year1,313 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 53 km (33 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 63 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 13 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h

Peugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech

  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost
Peugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.0 EcoBoost
1.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsFordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
1.2 PureTech
1.2
VS
Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTechvsPeugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2
1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI
1.2 PureTech
1.6 PureTech
VS
Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTechvsPeugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
1.0 EcoBoost
35 TFSI
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsAUDIQ2L35 TFSI
1.2 PureTech
1.5 TSI
VS
Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTechvsVolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI
1.0 EcoBoost
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
1.2 PureTech
35 TDI
VS
Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTechvsAUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TDI
1.0 EcoBoost
Cooper D 2.0
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
1.0 EcoBoost
35 TFSI
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsAUDIQ235 TFSI
1.2 PureTech
18d
VS
Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTechvsBMWX2 (F39)18d
1.0 EcoBoost
280TSI
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenTacqua280TSI
Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost vs Peugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech - car comparison - FastVsFaster