Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II)
Car comparison
Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTechvsPeugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPeugeot 2008 II
1.2 PureTech
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.0 s
- Fastest top speed222 km/h138 mph
- Most powerful181 hp135 kW
- Highest torque250 Nm184 lb-ft
- Largest trunk520 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score46/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Peugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech
- Lightest1,205 kg2,657 lb
- Best power-to-weight129 hp/t96 kW/t7.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range880 km547 mi
- Best economy score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 181hp135kW | 155hp116kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 240Nm177lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,429kg3,150lb | 1,205kg2,657lb |
| Gross weight | 1,970kg4,343lb | 1,748kg3,854lb |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 83.9s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 73.4s99% target: 206 km/h / 128 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.0s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.0s Calculated | 49.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.6s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 127hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 129hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 175Nm/t117lb-ft/ton Calculated | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 679km422mi Calculated | 880km547mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,598cc98cu in | 1,199cc73cu in |
| Length | 4,447mm175in | 4,300mm169in |
| Width | 1,841mm72in | 1,770mm70in |
| Height | 1,624mm64in | 1,550mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,675mm105in | 2,605mm103in |
| Front track | 1,601mm63in | 1,540mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,610mm63in | 1,540mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 219mm9in | - |
| Trunk volume | 520L | 405L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,482L | 1,467L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 53L | 44L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 114g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech: Power / Torque
- Peugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 5,500 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | 5,500 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.6 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.0 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.0 s | 49.8 s |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 91 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 181 hp 135 kW |
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | 155 hp 116 kW |
Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech has 26 hp more than Peugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech.
The biggest power difference is between Peugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech and Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech: 26 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 1,429 kg 3,150 lb |
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | 1,205 kg 2,657 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | 208 km/h 129 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 8.0 s |
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | 8.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech and Peugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Peugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech and Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech: 2.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 679 km 422 mi |
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | 880 km 547 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 181 hp 135 kW | 8.0 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | 155 hp 116 kW | 8.2 s | 208 km/h 129 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech |
| 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 181 hp 135 kW | 155 hp 116 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.0 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,429 kg 3,150 lb | 1,205 kg 2,657 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 679 km 422 mi | 880 km 547 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 114 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | 405 L 14.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech | Peugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK | 5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.65 LC100 km | 8.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi | 14.08 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal | 750 L198 US gal165 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,048 LC/year | 1,313 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech
- Has 26 hp more
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 115 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Peugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech
- Is 224 kg lighter
- Uses 2.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 201 km (125 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























