Car comparison

Ford Puma · Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsFord Evos 2.0 EcoBoost

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford Puma · Facelift 2024

ST 1.0 EcoBoost

170 hp999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-present
VS

Ford Evos

2.0 EcoBoost

238 hp1999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2021-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.6 s
  • Most powerful
    238 hp
    177 kW
  • Highest torque
    376 Nm
    277 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    144 hp/t
    107 kW/t
    7.0 kg/hp
  • Best estimated range
    880 km
    547 mi
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best performance score
    53/100
  • Best practicality score
    89/100

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph Unrestricted
    210 km/h
    130 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,315 kg
    2,899 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.5 L/100 km
    36.2 mpg US
    43.5 mpg UK
  • Best economy score
    89/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostFordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
Power
170hp127kW
238hp177kW
Torque
248Nm183lb-ft
376Nm277lb-ft
Curb weight
1,315kg2,899lb
1,655kg3,649lb
Gross weight
1,850kg4,079lb
2,065kg4,553lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
193 km/h
120 mph
To 99% top speed
72.5s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
54.9s99% target: 191 km/h / 119 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.4s
6.6s
0-200 km/h
34.8s
Calculated
-
0-60 mph
7.0s
Calculated
6.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
14.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
129hp/t96kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
189Nm/t126lb-ft/ton
Calculated
227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
646km402mi
Calculated
880km547mi
Calculated
Displacement
999cc61cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
4,226mm166in
4,920mm194in
Width
1,805mm71in
1,920mm76in
Height
1,533mm60in
1,600mm63in
Wheelbase
2,588mm102in
2,945mm116in
Front track
1,567mm62in
1,628mm64in
Rear track
1,523mm60in
1,610mm63in
Ground clearance
152mm6in
168mm7in
Trunk volume
456L
-
Max trunk volume
1,216L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
42L
66L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoostFord Evos 2.0 EcoBoostPowerTorque
  • Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
  • Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost5,750 rpm3,000 rpm6,000 rpm
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost5,500 rpm2,500-3,750 rpm6,800 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostFordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.0 s
6.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.4 s
6.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
34.8 s
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
193 km/h
120 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
9.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
12.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
14.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
151 km/h
94 mph
149 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
170 hp
127 kW
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
238 hp
177 kW

Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost has 68 hp more than Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost and Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost: 68 hp (51 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
248 Nm
183 lb-ft
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
376 Nm
277 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1,315 kg
2,899 lb
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
1,655 kg
3,649 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
193 km/h
120 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost7.4 s
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost6.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost and Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost and Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost: 1.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
646 km
402 mi
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
880 km
547 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
170 hp
127 kW
7.4 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
238 hp
177 kW
6.6 s
193 km/h
120 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,226 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,533 mm
60.4 in
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
Power
238 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
193 km/h
120 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,920 mm
193.7 in
Height
1,600 mm
63.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
Power
238 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
193 km/h
120 mph
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
7.4 s
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
6.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostFordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
Power
170 hp
127 kW
238 hp
177 kW
Torque
248 Nm
183 lb-ft
376 Nm
277 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.4 s
6.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
193 km/h
120 mph
Lightness
1,315 kg
2,899 lb
1,655 kg
3,649 lb
Fuel consumption
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,226 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,533 mm
60.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,920 mm
193.7 in
Height
1,600 mm
63.0 in
Range score
646 km
402 mi
880 km
547 mi
Trunk score
456 L
16.1 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoostFord Evos 2.0 EcoBoost
Consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.38 LC100 km13.13 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.31 LC100 mi21.12 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used975 L258 US gal214 UK gal1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,706 LC/year1,969 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Is 340 kg lighter
  • Has 27 km/h (17 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power

Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Has 68 hp more
  • Has 128 Nm more
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 234 km (145 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford Puma ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsFordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsCupraTerramar1.5 TSI
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoostvsFordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI
2.0 EcoBoost
25d
VS
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoostvsBMWX2 (F39)25d
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1.6 T-GDI
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsHyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI
2.0 EcoBoost
300
VS
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoostvsLexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenTiguan III1.5 TSI
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TSI
VS
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
GLB 220
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220
2.0 EcoBoost
650T
VS
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoostvsChevroletBlazer650T
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
GLA 250e
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250e
Ford Puma · Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost vs Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost - car comparison - FastVsFaster