Volkswagen Tiguan II · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Volkswagen Tiguan II · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSIvsFord Evos 2.0 EcoBoost
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Evos
2.0 EcoBoost
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Fastest top speed229 km/h142 mph
- Most powerful245 hp183 kW
- Lightest1,613 kg3,556 lb
- Best power-to-weight152 hp/t113 kW/t6.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best economy score87/100
Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost
- Highest torque376 Nm277 lb-ft
- Best estimated range880 km547 mi
- Best practicality score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245hp183kW | 238hp177kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 376Nm277lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,613kg3,556lb | 1,655kg3,649lb |
| Gross weight | 2,230kg4,916lb | 2,065kg4,553lb |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 193 km/h 120 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 61.5s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 54.9s99% target: 191 km/h / 119 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.0s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.1s Calculated | - |
| 0-60 mph | 5.7s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 152hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated | 227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 806km501mi Calculated | 880km547mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,509mm178in | 4,920mm194in |
| Width | 1,839mm72in | 1,920mm76in |
| Height | 1,684mm66in | 1,600mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,679mm105in | 2,945mm116in |
| Front track | 1,586mm62in | 1,628mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,576mm62in | 1,610mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 201mm8in | 168mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 615L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,655L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 66L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 5,000 rpm | 1,600-4,300 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost | 5,500 rpm | 2,500-3,750 rpm | 6,800 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.7 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.0 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.1 s | - |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 193 km/h 120 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 101 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 245 hp 183 kW |
| FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost | 238 hp 177 kW |
Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI has 7 hp more than Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost.
The biggest power difference is between Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost and Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost | 376 Nm 277 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 1,613 kg 3,556 lb |
| FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost | 193 km/h 120 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 6.0 s |
| FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost | 6.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
| FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 806 km 501 mi |
| FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost | 880 km 547 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 245 hp 183 kW | 6.0 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost | 238 hp 177 kW | 6.6 s | 193 km/h 120 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 6.0 s |
| FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp 183 kW | 238 hp 177 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 376 Nm 277 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.0 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 193 km/h 120 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,613 kg 3,556 lb | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 806 km 501 mi | 880 km 547 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 615 L 21.7 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI | Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.60 LC100 km | 13.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,890 LC/year | 1,969 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Has 7 hp more
- Is 42 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 36 km/h (22 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost
- Has 6 Nm more
- Has 74 km (46 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























