Car comparison

Chevrolet Blazer 650TvsFord Evos 2.0 EcoBoost

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Chevrolet Blazer

650T

237 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2020-2022
VS

Ford Evos

2.0 EcoBoost

238 hp1999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2021-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.6 s
  • Most powerful
    238 hp
    177 kW
  • Highest torque
    376 Nm
    277 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,655 kg
    3,649 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    144 hp/t
    107 kW/t
    7.0 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best performance score
    53/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100

Chevrolet Blazer 650T

  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph Unrestricted
    210 km/h
    130 mph Restricted
  • Best practicality score
    92/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelChevroletBlazer650TFordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
Power
237hp177kW
238hp177kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
376Nm277lb-ft
Curb weight
1,835kg4,045lb
1,655kg3,649lb
Gross weight-
2,065kg4,553lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
193 km/h
120 mph
To 99% top speed
101.7s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
54.9s99% target: 191 km/h / 119 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
9.0s
6.6s
0-200 km/h
46.6s
Calculated
-
0-60 mph
8.5s
Calculated
6.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption-
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
16.5s
Calculated
14.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
129hp/t96kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
191Nm/t128lb-ft/ton
Calculated
227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
880km547mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
4,999mm197in
4,920mm194in
Width
1,953mm77in
1,920mm76in
Height
1,732mm68in
1,600mm63in
Wheelbase
2,863mm113in
2,945mm116in
Front track
1,687mm66in
1,628mm64in
Rear track
1,683mm66in
1,610mm63in
Ground clearance-
168mm7in
Trunk volume
1,017L
-
Max trunk volume
2,103L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
73L
66L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Chevrolet Blazer 650TFord Evos 2.0 EcoBoostPowerTorque
  • Chevrolet Blazer 650T: Power / Torque
  • Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
ChevroletBlazer650T5,000 rpm1,500-4,000 rpm5,250 rpm
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost5,500 rpm2,500-3,750 rpm6,800 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricChevroletBlazer650TFordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.5 s
6.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
9.0 s
6.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
46.6 s
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
193 km/h
120 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
7.1 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.8 s
9.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.9 s
12.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.5 s
14.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
140 km/h
87 mph
149 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletBlazer650T
237 hp
177 kW
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
238 hp
177 kW

Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost has 1 hp more than Chevrolet Blazer 650T.

The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet Blazer 650T and Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost: 1 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletBlazer650T
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
376 Nm
277 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletBlazer650T
1,835 kg
4,045 lb
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
1,655 kg
3,649 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletBlazer650T
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
193 km/h
120 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletBlazer650T9.0 s
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost6.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost and Chevrolet Blazer 650T: 2.4 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletBlazer650T
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
ChevroletBlazer650T
237 hp
177 kW
9.0 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
238 hp
177 kW
6.6 s
193 km/h
120 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
ChevroletBlazer650T
Power
237 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,017 L
35.9 cu ft
Length
4,999 mm
196.8 in
Height
1,732 mm
68.2 in
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
Power
238 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
193 km/h
120 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,920 mm
193.7 in
Height
1,600 mm
63.0 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleChevroletBlazer650TFordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
Power
237 hp
177 kW
238 hp
177 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
376 Nm
277 lb-ft
Acceleration
9.0 s
6.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
193 km/h
120 mph
Lightness
1,835 kg
4,045 lb
1,655 kg
3,649 lb
Fuel consumption
-
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,017 L
35.9 cu ft
Length
4,999 mm
196.8 in
Height
1,732 mm
68.2 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,920 mm
193.7 in
Height
1,600 mm
63.0 in
Range score
-
880 km
547 mi
Trunk score
1,017 L
35.9 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord Evos 2.0 EcoBoost
Consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.13 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.12 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,969 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Chevrolet Blazer 650T

  • Has 27 km/h (17 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Highest top speed

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Has 1 hp more
  • Has 26 Nm more
  • Is 180 kg lighter
  • Is 2.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Chevrolet Blazer 650T
Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Chevrolet Blazer 650T vs Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost - car comparison - FastVsFaster