Car comparison

Lexus NX I (AZ10) · Facelift 2017 300vsFord Evos 2.0 EcoBoost

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Lexus NX I (AZ10) · Facelift 2017

300

238 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2021
VS

Ford Evos

2.0 EcoBoost

238 hp1999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2021-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.6 s
  • Highest torque
    376 Nm
    277 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,655 kg
    3,649 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    144 hp/t
    107 kW/t
    7.0 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.5 L/100 km
    31.4 mpg US
    37.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    880 km
    547 mi
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best performance score
    53/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100
  • Best practicality score
    89/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
Power
238hp177kW
238hp177kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
376Nm277lb-ft
Curb weight
1,837kg4,050lb
1,655kg3,649lb
Gross weight
2,359kg5,201lb
2,065kg4,553lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
193 km/h
120 mph
To 99% top speed
74.4s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
54.9s99% target: 191 km/h / 119 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.2s
6.6s
0-200 km/h
45.5s
Calculated
-
0-60 mph
6.8s
Calculated
6.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.2s
Calculated
14.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
191Nm/t127lb-ft/ton
Calculated
227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
612km380mi
Calculated
880km547mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
4,638mm183in
4,920mm194in
Width
1,869mm74in
1,920mm76in
Height
1,646mm65in
1,600mm63in
Wheelbase
2,659mm105in
2,945mm116in
Front track-
1,628mm64in
Rear track-
1,610mm63in
Ground clearance
175mm7in
168mm7in
Trunk volume
501L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
66L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoostPowerTorque
  • Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300: Power / Torque
  • Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 20173004,800-5,600 rpm1,650-4,000 rpm5,850 rpm
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost5,500 rpm2,500-3,750 rpm6,800 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.8 s
6.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.2 s
6.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
45.5 s
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
193 km/h
120 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.9 s
9.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.8 s
12.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.2 s
14.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
149 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
238 hp
177 kW
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
238 hp
177 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
376 Nm
277 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
1,837 kg
4,050 lb
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
1,655 kg
3,649 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
193 km/h
120 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 20173007.2 s
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost6.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost and Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost and Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300: 2.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
612 km
380 mi
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
880 km
547 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
238 hp
177 kW
7.2 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
238 hp
177 kW
6.6 s
193 km/h
120 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
Power
238 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
501 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,638 mm
182.6 in
Height
1,646 mm
64.8 in
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
Power
238 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
193 km/h
120 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,920 mm
193.7 in
Height
1,600 mm
63.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
Power
238 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
Power
238 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
193 km/h
120 mph
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK
7.2 s
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
6.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
Power
238 hp
177 kW
238 hp
177 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
376 Nm
277 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.2 s
6.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
193 km/h
120 mph
Lightness
1,837 kg
4,050 lb
1,655 kg
3,649 lb
Fuel consumption
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
501 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,638 mm
182.6 in
Height
1,646 mm
64.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,920 mm
193.7 in
Height
1,600 mm
63.0 in
Range score
612 km
380 mi
880 km
547 mi
Trunk score
501 L
17.7 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost
Consumption9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km17.15 LC100 km13.13 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi27.60 LC100 mi21.12 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,573 LC/year1,969 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Has 26 Nm more
  • Is 182 kg lighter
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 268 km (166 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Lexus NX I (AZ10) 300
Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Lexus NX I (AZ10) · Facelift 2017 300 vs Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost - car comparison - FastVsFaster