Lexus NX I (AZ10) · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Lexus NX I (AZ10) · Facelift 2017 300vsFord Evos 2.0 EcoBoost
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Evos
2.0 EcoBoost
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Highest torque376 Nm277 lb-ft
- Lightest1,655 kg3,649 lb
- Best power-to-weight144 hp/t107 kW/t7.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range880 km547 mi
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph Unrestricted200 km/h124 mph Restricted
- Most powerful238 hp177 kW
Specification comparison
| Model | LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 238hp177kW | 238hp177kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 376Nm277lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,837kg4,050lb | 1,655kg3,649lb |
| Gross weight | 2,359kg5,201lb | 2,065kg4,553lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated | 193 km/h 120 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.4s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 54.9s99% target: 191 km/h / 119 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 45.5s Calculated | - |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 191Nm/t127lb-ft/ton Calculated | 227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 612km380mi Calculated | 880km547mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,638mm183in | 4,920mm194in |
| Width | 1,869mm74in | 1,920mm76in |
| Height | 1,646mm65in | 1,600mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,659mm105in | 2,945mm116in |
| Front track | - | 1,628mm64in |
| Rear track | - | 1,610mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 175mm7in | 168mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 501L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 66L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300: Power / Torque
- Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 4,800-5,600 rpm | 1,650-4,000 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
| FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost | 5,500 rpm | 2,500-3,750 rpm | 6,800 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 45.5 s | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited | 193 km/h 120 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 238 hp 177 kW |
| FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost | 238 hp 177 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost | 376 Nm 277 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 1,837 kg 4,050 lb |
| FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost | 193 km/h 120 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 7.2 s |
| FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost | 6.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost and Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
| FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost and Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300: 2.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
| FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 612 km 380 mi |
| FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost | 880 km 547 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 238 hp 177 kW | 7.2 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost | 238 hp 177 kW | 6.6 s | 193 km/h 120 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 |
| 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
| FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300 | FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 238 hp 177 kW | 238 hp 177 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 376 Nm 277 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | 193 km/h 120 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,837 kg 4,050 lb | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 612 km 380 mi | 880 km 547 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 501 L 17.7 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300 | Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.15 LC100 km | 13.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.60 LC100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,573 LC/year | 1,969 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300
- Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost
- Has 26 Nm more
- Is 182 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 268 km (166 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























