Car comparison

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5vsLexus NX I (AZ10) · Facelift 2017 300

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 D5

235 hp1969 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2018-2019
VS

Lexus NX I (AZ10) · Facelift 2017

300

238 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph
  • Highest torque
    480 Nm
    354 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.8 L/100 km
    34.6 mpg US
    41.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,183 km
    735 mi
  • Largest trunk
    505 L
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best performance score
    53/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoXC60 II2.0 D5LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
Power
235hp175kW
238hp177kW
Torque
480Nm354lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
2,051kg4,522lb
1,837kg4,050lb
Gross weight-
2,359kg5,201lb
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
82.6s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
74.4s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.2s
7.2s
0-200 km/h
37.7s
Calculated
45.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.8s
Calculated
6.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.2s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
115hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton
Calculated
191Nm/t127lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,183km735mi
Calculated
612km380mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,688mm185in
4,638mm183in
Width
1,902mm75in
1,869mm74in
Height
1,658mm65in
1,646mm65in
Wheelbase
2,865mm113in
2,659mm105in
Front track
1,668mm66in
-
Rear track
1,673mm66in
-
Ground clearance
216mm9in
175mm7in
Trunk volume
505L
501L
Max trunk volume
1,432L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
71L
60L
CO2 emissions
158g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300PowerTorque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5: Power / Torque
  • Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D54,000 rpm1,740-2,220 rpm5,000 rpm
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 20173004,800-5,600 rpm1,650-4,000 rpm5,850 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoXC60 II2.0 D5LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.8 s
6.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.2 s
7.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
37.7 s
45.5 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.9 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.8 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.2 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
149 km/h
92 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
235 hp
175 kW
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
238 hp
177 kW

Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300 has 3 hp more than Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 and Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300: 3 hp (2 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
480 Nm
354 lb-ft
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
2,051 kg
4,522 lb
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
1,837 kg
4,050 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
220 km/h
137 mph
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D57.2 s
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 20173007.2 s

Although Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300 has more power, Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 and Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300: 3.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
115 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
1,183 km
735 mi
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
612 km
380 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
235 hp
175 kW
7.2 s
220 km/h
137 mph
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
238 hp
177 kW
7.2 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
Power
235 hp
175 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
Power
238 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
501 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,638 mm
182.6 in
Height
1,646 mm
64.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
Power
235 hp
175 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
Power
238 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
7.2 s
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK
7.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
115 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoXC60 II2.0 D5LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
Power
235 hp
175 kW
238 hp
177 kW
Torque
480 Nm
354 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.2 s
7.2 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
2,051 kg
4,522 lb
1,837 kg
4,050 lb
Fuel consumption
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
501 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,638 mm
182.6 in
Height
1,646 mm
64.8 in
Range score
1,183 km
735 mi
612 km
380 mi
CO2 score
158 g/km
-
Trunk score
505 L
17.8 cu ft
501 L
17.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
115 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D5Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300
Consumption6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.50 LC100 km17.15 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.90 LC100 mi27.60 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used900 L238 US gal198 UK gal1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,575 LC/year2,573 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5

  • Has 130 Nm more
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 3.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 571 km (355 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 4 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Lexus NX I (AZ10) Facelift 2017 300

  • Has 3 hp more
  • Is 214 kg lighter
  • Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5
Lexus NX I (AZ10) 300
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 D5
2.0 D5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
300
200t
VS
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300vsLexusNX I (AZ10)200t
2.0 D5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
300
350h
VS
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300vsLexusNX II (AZ20)350h
2.0 D5
2.0 D240
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
300
450d V8
VS
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300vsLexusLX IIIFacelift 2015450d V8
2.0 D5
25d
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5vsJaguarF-Pace25d
2.0 D5
45 TDI V6
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5vsAUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6
2.0 D5
300
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5vsLexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
300
2.0 T5
VS
LexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
2.0 D5
2.0 TSI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI
2.0 D5
25i
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5vsBMWX1 (F48)25i
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 vs Lexus NX I (AZ10) · Facelift 2017 300 - car comparison - FastVsFaster