Volkswagen Tiguan II
Car comparison
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSIvsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC60 II
2.0 D5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.3 s
- Fastest top speed228 km/h142 mph
- Lightest1,635 kg3,605 lb
- Best power-to-weight141 hp/t105 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk615 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5
- Most powerful235 hp175 kW
- Highest torque480 Nm354 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions158 g/km
- Best estimated range1,183 km735 mi
- Best economy score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 230hp172kW | 235hp175kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 480Nm354lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,635kg3,605lb | 2,051kg4,522lb |
| Gross weight | 2,280kg5,027lb | - |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 65.3s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 82.6s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.3s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.9s Calculated | 37.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.0s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 115hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated | 234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 779km484mi Calculated | 1,183km735mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,486mm177in | 4,688mm185in |
| Width | 1,839mm72in | 1,902mm75in |
| Height | 1,673mm66in | 1,658mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,677mm105in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,586mm62in | 1,668mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,576mm62in | 1,673mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 200mm8in | 216mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 615L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,655L | 1,432L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 71L |
| CO2 emissions | 175g/km | 158g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 4,500 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 4,750 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 4,000 rpm | 1,740-2,220 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.0 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.3 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.9 s | 37.7 s |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 99 mph | 149 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 230 hp 172 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 235 hp 175 kW |
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 has 5 hp more than Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 2,051 kg 4,522 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 6.3 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 7.2 s |
Although Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 has more power, Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 and Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 115 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 779 km 484 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 1,183 km 735 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 230 hp 172 kW | 6.3 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 235 hp 175 kW | 7.2 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 115 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 230 hp 172 kW | 235 hp 175 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.3 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb | 2,051 kg 4,522 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 779 km 484 mi | 1,183 km 735 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 175 g/km | 158 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 615 L 21.7 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 115 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI
- Is 416 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 110 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 130 Nm more
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 404 km (251 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 17 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























