AUDI Q8 (4M)
Car comparison
AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI V6vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC60 II
2.0 D5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5
- Most powerful235 hp175 kW
- Lightest2,051 kg4,522 lb
- Best power-to-weight115 hp/t85 kW/t8.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions158 g/km
- Best estimated range1,183 km735 mi
- Best economy score91/100
AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed233 km/h145 mph
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Largest trunk605 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6 | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231hp172kW | 235hp175kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 480Nm354lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,145kg4,729lb | 2,051kg4,522lb |
| Gross weight | 2,890kg6,371lb | - |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 100.0s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated | 82.6s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 34.1s Calculated | 37.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 108hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 115hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton Calculated | 234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,119km696mi Calculated | 1,183km735mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,967cc181cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,986mm196in | 4,688mm185in |
| Width | 1,995mm79in | 1,902mm75in |
| Height | 1,705mm67in | 1,658mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,995mm118in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,679mm66in | 1,668mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,691mm67in | 1,673mm66in |
| Ground clearance | - | 216mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 605L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,755L | 1,432L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 71L |
| CO2 emissions | 176g/km | 158g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI V6: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6 | 3,250-4,750 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 4,000 rpm | 1,740-2,220 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6 | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 34.1 s | 37.7 s |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 149 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6 | 231 hp 172 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 235 hp 175 kW |
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 has 4 hp more than AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI V6.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI V6 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6 | 2,145 kg 4,729 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 2,051 kg 4,522 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6 | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6 | 7.1 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 7.2 s |
Although Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 has more power, AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI V6 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 and AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI V6: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6 | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 115 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6 | 1,119 km 696 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 1,183 km 735 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6 | 231 hp 172 kW | 7.1 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 235 hp 175 kW | 7.2 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6 |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6 | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 115 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6 | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp 172 kW | 235 hp 175 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,145 kg 4,729 lb | 2,051 kg 4,522 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,119 km 696 mi | 1,183 km 735 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 176 g/km | 158 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 605 L 21.4 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 115 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI V6 | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.73 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,759 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI V6
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Has 100 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5
- Has 4 hp more
- Is 94 kg lighter
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 64 km (40 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 18 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























