Car comparison

BMW X1 (F48) 25ivsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D5

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW X1 (F48)

25i

231 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2019
VS

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 D5

235 hp1969 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2018-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW X1 (F48) 25i

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    235 km/h
    146 mph
  • Lightest
    1,580 kg
    3,483 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    146 hp/t
    109 kW/t
    6.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    155 g/km
  • Largest trunk
    505 L
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best performance score
    56/100

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5

  • Most powerful
    235 hp
    175 kW
  • Highest torque
    480 Nm
    354 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.8 L/100 km
    34.6 mpg US
    41.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,183 km
    735 mi
  • Best economy score
    91/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWX1 (F48)25iVolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
Power
231hp172kW
235hp175kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
480Nm354lb-ft
Curb weight
1,580kg3,483lb
2,051kg4,522lb
Gross weight
2,160kg4,762lb
-
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
To 99% top speed
69.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
82.6s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.6s
7.2s
0-200 km/h
25.9s
Calculated
37.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.3s
Calculated
6.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.6s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
115hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
222Nm/t148lb-ft/ton
Calculated
234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
897km557mi
Calculated
1,183km735mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,439mm175in
4,688mm185in
Width
1,821mm72in
1,902mm75in
Height
1,598mm63in
1,658mm65in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,865mm113in
Front track
1,561mm61in
1,668mm66in
Rear track
1,562mm61in
1,673mm66in
Ground clearance
183mm7in
216mm9in
Trunk volume
505L
505L
Max trunk volume
1,550L
1,432L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
61L
71L
CO2 emissions
155g/km
158g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW X1 (F48) 25iVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D5PowerTorque
  • BMW X1 (F48) 25i: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWX1 (F48)25i5,000-6,000 rpm1,350-4,500 rpm6,250 rpm
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D54,000 rpm1,740-2,220 rpm5,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWX1 (F48)25iVolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.3 s
6.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.6 s
7.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
25.9 s
37.7 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.6 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.4 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.6 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
160 km/h
99 mph
149 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)25i
231 hp
172 kW
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
235 hp
175 kW

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 has 4 hp more than BMW X1 (F48) 25i.

The biggest power difference is between BMW X1 (F48) 25i and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)25i
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
480 Nm
354 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)25i
1,580 kg
3,483 lb
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
2,051 kg
4,522 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)25i
235 km/h
146 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
220 km/h
137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)25i6.6 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D57.2 s

Although Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 has more power, BMW X1 (F48) 25i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X1 (F48) 25i and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)25i
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 and BMW X1 (F48) 25i: 0.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)25i
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
115 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)25i
897 km
557 mi
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
1,183 km
735 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWX1 (F48)25i
231 hp
172 kW
6.6 s
235 km/h
146 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
235 hp
175 kW
7.2 s
220 km/h
137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWX1 (F48)25i
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,439 mm
174.8 in
Height
1,598 mm
62.9 in
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
Power
235 hp
175 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWX1 (F48)25i
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
Power
235 hp
175 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

BMW X1 (F48) 25i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWX1 (F48)25i
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
6.6 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
7.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWX1 (F48)25i
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
115 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWX1 (F48)25iVolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
Power
231 hp
172 kW
235 hp
175 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
480 Nm
354 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.6 s
7.2 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Lightness
1,580 kg
3,483 lb
2,051 kg
4,522 lb
Fuel consumption
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,439 mm
174.8 in
Height
1,598 mm
62.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Range score
897 km
557 mi
1,183 km
735 mi
CO2 score
155 g/km
158 g/km
Trunk score
505 L
17.8 cu ft
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
115 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW X1 (F48) 25iVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D5
Consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.90 LC100 km10.50 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.15 LC100 mi16.90 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal900 L238 US gal198 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,785 LC/year1,575 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW X1 (F48) 25i

  • Is 471 kg lighter
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 32 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 3 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Has 130 Nm more
  • Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 286 km (178 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW X1 (F48) 25i
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

25i
28i
VS
BMWX1 (F48)25ivsBMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i
2.0 D5
2.0 D5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
25i
28i
VS
BMWX1 (F48)25ivsBMWX1 (E84)28i
2.0 D5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
25i
23i
VS
BMWX1 (F48)25ivsBMWX1 (U11)23i
2.0 D5
2.0 D240
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
25i
25d
VS
BMWX1 (F48)25ivsBMWX2 (F39)25d
2.0 D5
25d
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5vsJaguarF-Pace25d
25i
28i
VS
BMWX1 (F48)25ivsBMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428i
2.0 D5
300
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5vsLexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
25i
30d
VS
BMWX1 (F48)25ivsBMWX7 (G07)30d
2.0 D5
45 TDI V6
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5vsAUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6
BMW X1 (F48) 25i vs Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 - car comparison - FastVsFaster