Car comparison

BMW X2 (F39) 25dvsFord Evos 2.0 EcoBoost

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW X2 (F39)

25d

231 hp1995 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2019-2023
VS

Ford Evos

2.0 EcoBoost

238 hp1999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2021-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW X2 (F39) 25d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    237 km/h
    147 mph
  • Highest torque
    450 Nm
    332 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,620 kg
    3,571 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,000 km
    621 mi
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best performance score
    58/100
  • Best economy score
    93/100

Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Most powerful
    238 hp
    177 kW
  • Best power-to-weight
    144 hp/t
    107 kW/t
    7.0 kg/hp
  • Best practicality score
    89/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWX2 (F39)25dFordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
Power
231hp172kW
238hp177kW
Torque
450Nm332lb-ft
376Nm277lb-ft
Curb weight
1,620kg3,571lb
1,655kg3,649lb
Gross weight
2,170kg4,784lb
2,065kg4,553lb
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
193 km/h
120 mph
To 99% top speed
70.0s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
54.9s99% target: 191 km/h / 119 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.6s
6.6s
0-200 km/h
25.6s
Calculated
-
0-60 mph
6.3s
Calculated
6.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
14.6s
Calculated
14.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
143hp/t106kW/t65hp/1000 lb
Calculated
144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
278Nm/t186lb-ft/ton
Calculated
227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,000km621mi
Calculated
880km547mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,995cc122cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
4,360mm172in
4,920mm194in
Width
1,824mm72in
1,920mm76in
Height
1,526mm60in
1,600mm63in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,945mm116in
Front track
1,563mm62in
1,628mm64in
Rear track
1,562mm61in
1,610mm63in
Ground clearance-
168mm7in
Trunk volume
470L
-
Max trunk volume
1,355L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
51L
66L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW X2 (F39) 25dFord Evos 2.0 EcoBoostPowerTorque
  • BMW X2 (F39) 25d: Power / Torque
  • Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWX2 (F39)25d4,400 rpm1,500-3,000 rpm4,650 rpm
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost5,500 rpm2,500-3,750 rpm6,800 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWX2 (F39)25dFordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.3 s
6.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.6 s
6.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
25.6 s
-
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
193 km/h
120 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.6 s
9.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.4 s
12.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.6 s
14.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
160 km/h
99 mph
149 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)25d
231 hp
172 kW
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
238 hp
177 kW

Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost has 7 hp more than BMW X2 (F39) 25d.

The biggest power difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 25d and Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost: 7 hp (5 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)25d
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
376 Nm
277 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)25d
1,620 kg
3,571 lb
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
1,655 kg
3,649 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)25d
237 km/h
147 mph
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
193 km/h
120 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)25d6.6 s
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost6.6 s

Although Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost has more power, BMW X2 (F39) 25d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)25d
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 25d and Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost: 2.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)25d
143 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX2 (F39)25d
1,000 km
621 mi
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
880 km
547 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWX2 (F39)25d
231 hp
172 kW
6.6 s
237 km/h
147 mph
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
238 hp
177 kW
6.6 s
193 km/h
120 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWX2 (F39)25d
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
4,360 mm
171.7 in
Height
1,526 mm
60.1 in
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
Power
238 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
193 km/h
120 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,920 mm
193.7 in
Height
1,600 mm
63.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWX2 (F39)25d
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
Power
238 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
193 km/h
120 mph
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

BMW X2 (F39) 25d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWX2 (F39)25d
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
6.6 s
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
6.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWX2 (F39)25d
143 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWX2 (F39)25dFordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
Power
231 hp
172 kW
238 hp
177 kW
Torque
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
376 Nm
277 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.6 s
6.6 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
193 km/h
120 mph
Lightness
1,620 kg
3,571 lb
1,655 kg
3,649 lb
Fuel consumption
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
4,360 mm
171.7 in
Height
1,526 mm
60.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,920 mm
193.7 in
Height
1,600 mm
63.0 in
Range score
1,000 km
621 mi
880 km
547 mi
Trunk score
470 L
16.6 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
143 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW X2 (F39) 25dFord Evos 2.0 EcoBoost
Consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.92 LC100 km13.13 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi14.36 LC100 mi21.12 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used765 L202 US gal168 UK gal1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,339 LC/year1,969 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW X2 (F39) 25d

  • Has 74 Nm more
  • Is 35 kg lighter
  • Has 44 km/h (27 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 120 km (75 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power

Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Has 7 hp more
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW X2 (F39) 25d
Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

BMW X2 (F39) 25d vs Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost - car comparison - FastVsFaster