Volkswagen Touareg III (CR)
Car comparison
Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSIvsFord Evos 2.0 EcoBoost
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Evos
2.0 EcoBoost
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Highest torque376 Nm277 lb-ft
- Lightest1,655 kg3,649 lb
- Best power-to-weight144 hp/t107 kW/t7.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Best economy score87/100
Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Most powerful249 hp186 kW
- Best estimated range915 km568 mi
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 249hp186kW | 238hp177kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 376Nm277lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,955kg4,310lb | 1,655kg3,649lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,065kg4,553lb |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 193 km/h 120 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 82.2s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 54.9s99% target: 191 km/h / 119 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.6s Calculated | - |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 127hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 189Nm/t127lb-ft/ton Calculated | 227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 915km568mi Calculated | 880km547mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,878mm192in | 4,920mm194in |
| Width | 1,984mm78in | 1,920mm76in |
| Height | 1,717mm68in | 1,600mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,904mm114in | 2,945mm116in |
| Front track | 1,669mm66in | 1,628mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,685mm66in | 1,610mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 215mm8in | 168mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 810L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,800L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 188g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,600-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost | 5,500 rpm | 2,500-3,750 rpm | 6,800 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.6 s | - |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 193 km/h 120 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 249 hp 186 kW |
| FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost | 238 hp 177 kW |
Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI has 11 hp more than Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost.
The biggest power difference is between Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost and Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI: 11 hp (8 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost | 376 Nm 277 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 1,955 kg 4,310 lb |
| FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost | 193 km/h 120 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 6.8 s |
| FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost | 6.6 s |
Although Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI has more power, Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost and Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
| FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost and Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
| FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 915 km 568 mi |
| FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost | 880 km 547 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 249 hp 186 kW | 6.8 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost | 238 hp 177 kW | 6.6 s | 193 km/h 120 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
| FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 249 hp 186 kW | 238 hp 177 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 376 Nm 277 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 193 km/h 120 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,955 kg 4,310 lb | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 915 km 568 mi | 880 km 547 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 188 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 810 L 28.6 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI | Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.35 LC100 km | 13.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,153 LC/year | 1,969 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI
- Has 11 hp more
- Has 32 km/h (20 mph) higher top speed
- Has 35 km (22 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost
- Has 6 Nm more
- Is 300 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























