Car comparison

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoostvsFord Evos 2.0 EcoBoost

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford Puma

ST 1.5 EcoBoost

200 hp1496 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSUV2020-2024
VS

Ford Evos

2.0 EcoBoost

238 hp1999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2021-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost

  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph Unrestricted
    220 km/h
    137 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,358 kg
    2,994 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    147 hp/t
    110 kW/t
    6.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Best performance score
    54/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100

Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.6 s
  • Most powerful
    238 hp
    177 kW
  • Highest torque
    376 Nm
    277 lb-ft
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best practicality score
    89/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostFordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
Power
200hp149kW
238hp177kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
376Nm277lb-ft
Curb weight
1,358kg2,994lb
1,655kg3,649lb
Gross weight
1,815kg4,001lb
2,065kg4,553lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Calculated
193 km/h
120 mph
To 99% top speed
68.1s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
54.9s99% target: 191 km/h / 119 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.7s
6.6s
0-200 km/h
27.5s
Calculated
-
0-60 mph
6.4s
Calculated
6.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
14.7s
Calculated
14.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton
Calculated
227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
880km547mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,496cc91cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
4,226mm166in
4,920mm194in
Width
1,805mm71in
1,920mm76in
Height
1,520mm60in
1,600mm63in
Wheelbase
2,588mm102in
2,945mm116in
Front track-
1,628mm64in
Rear track-
1,610mm63in
Ground clearance
152mm6in
168mm7in
Trunk volume
456L
-
Max trunk volume
1,216L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank-
66L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoostFord Evos 2.0 EcoBoostPowerTorque
  • Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
  • Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost6,000 rpm2,500-3,500 rpm6,250 rpm
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost5,500 rpm2,500-3,750 rpm6,800 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostFordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.4 s
6.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.7 s
6.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
27.5 s
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Likely limited
193 km/h
120 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
9.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.4 s
12.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.7 s
14.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
158 km/h
98 mph
149 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
200 hp
149 kW
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
238 hp
177 kW

Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost has 38 hp more than Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost and Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost: 38 hp (28 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
376 Nm
277 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
1,358 kg
2,994 lb
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
1,655 kg
3,649 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
193 km/h
120 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost6.7 s
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost6.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost and Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost and Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost: 1.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
200 hp
149 kW
6.7 s
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
238 hp
177 kW
6.6 s
193 km/h
120 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,226 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,520 mm
59.8 in
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
Power
238 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
193 km/h
120 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,920 mm
193.7 in
Height
1,600 mm
63.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
Power
238 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
193 km/h
120 mph
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
6.7 s
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
6.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostFordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
Power
200 hp
149 kW
238 hp
177 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
376 Nm
277 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.7 s
6.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
193 km/h
120 mph
Lightness
1,358 kg
2,994 lb
1,655 kg
3,649 lb
Fuel consumption
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,226 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,520 mm
59.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,920 mm
193.7 in
Height
1,600 mm
63.0 in
Range score
-
880 km
547 mi
Trunk score
456 L
16.1 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoostFord Evos 2.0 EcoBoost
Consumption6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.50 LC100 km13.13 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.90 LC100 mi21.12 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used900 L238 US gal198 UK gal1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,575 LC/year1,969 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost

  • Is 297 kg lighter
  • Has 37 km/h (23 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power

Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Has 38 hp more
  • Has 56 Nm more
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost
Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

ST 1.5 EcoBoost
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostvsFordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoostvsFordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
40 TDI
VS
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
2.0 EcoBoost
25d
VS
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoostvsBMWX2 (F39)25d
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
2.0 TSI
VS
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostvsCupraFormentor2.0 TSI
2.0 EcoBoost
300
VS
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoostvsLexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
2.2 MultiJet II
VS
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostvsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TSI
VS
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
2.0 EcoBoost
650T
VS
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoostvsChevroletBlazer650T
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
40 TDI
VS
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TSI
VS
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
1.5i P300e
VS
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostvsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e
Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost vs Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost - car comparison - FastVsFaster