Car comparison

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoostvsAUDI Q5 II (FY) · Facelift 2020 40 TDI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford Puma

ST 1.5 EcoBoost

200 hp1496 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSUV2020-2024
VS

AUDI Q5 II (FY) · Facelift 2020

40 TDI

204 hp1968 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2020-2024

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph Unrestricted
    220 km/h
    137 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,358 kg
    2,994 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    147 hp/t
    110 kW/t
    6.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.0 L/100 km
    47.0 mpg US
    56.5 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best performance score
    54/100

AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TDI

  • Most powerful
    204 hp
    152 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.4 L/100 km
    43.6 mpg US
    52.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.1 L/100 km
    38.6 mpg US
    46.3 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    520 L
  • Best economy score
    92/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI
Power
200hp149kW
204hp152kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,358kg2,994lb
1,805kg3,979lb
Gross weight
1,815kg4,001lb
2,510kg5,534lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Calculated
222 km/h
138 mph
To 99% top speed
68.1s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
84.2s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.7s
7.6s
0-200 km/h
27.5s
Calculated
37.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.4s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK
5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.7s
Calculated
15.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
113hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton
Calculated
222Nm/t148lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
1,204km748mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,496cc91cu in
1,968cc120cu in
Length
4,226mm166in
4,682mm184in
Width
1,805mm71in
1,893mm75in
Height
1,520mm60in
1,662mm65in
Wheelbase
2,588mm102in
2,819mm111in
Front track-
1,616mm64in
Rear track-
1,609mm63in
Ground clearance
152mm6in
-
Trunk volume
456L
520L
Max trunk volume
1,216L
1,520L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank-
65L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoostAUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TDIPowerTorque
  • Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
  • AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TDI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost6,000 rpm2,500-3,500 rpm6,250 rpm
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI3,800-4,200 rpm1,750-3,250 rpm4,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.4 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.7 s
7.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
27.5 s
37.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Likely limited
222 km/h
138 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.4 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.7 s
15.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
158 km/h
98 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
200 hp
149 kW
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI
204 hp
152 kW

AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TDI has 4 hp more than Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost and AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TDI: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
1,358 kg
2,994 lb
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI
1,805 kg
3,979 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI
222 km/h
138 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost6.7 s
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI7.6 s

Although AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TDI has more power, Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost and AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TDI: 0.9 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TDI and Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost: 0.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI
113 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
200 hp
149 kW
6.7 s
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI
204 hp
152 kW
7.6 s
222 km/h
138 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,226 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,520 mm
59.8 in
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
520 L
18.4 cu ft
Length
4,682 mm
184.3 in
Height
1,662 mm
65.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
6.7 s
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
7.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI
113 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
204 hp
152 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.7 s
7.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
Lightness
1,358 kg
2,994 lb
1,805 kg
3,979 lb
Fuel consumption
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,226 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,520 mm
59.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
520 L
18.4 cu ft
Length
4,682 mm
184.3 in
Height
1,662 mm
65.4 in
Range score
-
1,204 km
748 mi
Trunk score
456 L
16.1 cu ft
520 L
18.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
113 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoostAUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TDI
Consumption6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.50 LC100 km9.45 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.90 LC100 mi15.21 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used900 L238 US gal198 UK gal810 L214 US gal178 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,575 LC/year1,418 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost

  • Is 447 kg lighter
  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 34 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TDI

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Has 80 Nm more
  • Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 64 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 40 TDI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

ST 1.5 EcoBoost
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostvsFordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
40 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDIvsAUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TDI
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostvsFordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
40 TDI
40 TDI
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
40 TDI
VS
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
40 TDI
2.0 TFSI Hybrid
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDIvsAUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI Hybrid
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
2.0 TSI
VS
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostvsCupraFormentor2.0 TSI
40 TDI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDIvsAUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
2.2 MultiJet II
VS
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostvsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
2.0 TDI
VS
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDI
40 TDI
45 TDI
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDIvsAUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
1.5i P300e
VS
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostvsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e
Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost vs AUDI Q5 II (FY) · Facelift 2020 40 TDI - car comparison - FastVsFaster