Car comparison

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoostvsAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949) · Facelift 2022 2.2 MultiJet II

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford Puma

ST 1.5 EcoBoost

200 hp1496 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSUV2020-2024

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) · Facelift 2022

2.2 MultiJet II

210 hp2143 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2022-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Facelift 2022 2.2 MultiJet II

Quickest 0-100 km/h
6.6 s
Most powerful
210 hp
157 kW
Highest torque
470 Nm
347 lb-ft
Largest trunk
525 L
Best overall score
65/100
Best performance score
55/100
Best practicality score
85/100

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost

Fastest top speed
230 km/h
143 mph Unrestricted
220 km/h
137 mph Restricted
Lightest
1,358 kg
2,994 lb
Best power-to-weight
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
Lowest combined fuel consumption
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
Best economy score
91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
Model	FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost	Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II
Power	200hp149kW	210hp157kW
Torque	320Nm236lb-ft	470Nm347lb-ft
Curb weight	1,358kg2,994lb	1,745kg3,847lb
Gross weight	1,815kg4,001lb	2,410kg5,313lb
Top speed	Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated	215 km/h 134 mph
To 99% top speed	68.1s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated	70.0s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated
0-100 km/h	6.7s	6.6s
0-200 km/h	27.5s Calculated	36.6s Calculated
0-60 mph	6.4s Calculated	6.2s Calculated
Fuel consumption	6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK	6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city	7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK	-
Fuel consumption highway	5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK	-
Quarter mile	14.7s Calculated	14.8s Calculated
Power-to-weight	147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated	120hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated
Torque-to-weight	236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton Calculated	269Nm/t180lb-ft/ton Calculated
Estimated range	-	906km563mi Calculated
Displacement	1,496cc91cu in	2,143cc131cu in
Length	4,226mm166in	4,687mm185in
Width	1,805mm71in	1,903mm75in
Height	1,520mm60in	1,693mm67in
Wheelbase	2,588mm102in	2,818mm111in
Front track	-	1,627mm64in
Rear track	-	1,674mm66in
Ground clearance	152mm6in	-
Trunk volume	456L	525L
Max trunk volume	1,216L	1,600L
Doors	5	5
Seats	5	5
Fuel tank	-	58L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoostAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Facelift 2022 2.2 MultiJet IIPowerTorque

Dyno simulation data table
Vehicle	Peak power RPM	Peak torque RPM	Max engine speed
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost	6,000 rpm	2,500-3,500 rpm	6,250 rpm
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II	3,500 rpm	1,750 rpm	3,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
Metric	FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost	Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II
	Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h	6.4 s	6.2 s
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph	6.7 s	6.6 s
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph	27.5 s	36.6 s
Top speed	Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited	215 km/h 134 mph
	Drag race simulation
60 ft 18 m	2.5 s	2.3 s
330 ft 101 m	6.5 s	6.3 s
1/8 mile 201 m	9.7 s	9.5 s
1000 ft 305 m	12.4 s	12.4 s
1/4 mile 402 m	14.7 s	14.8 s
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m	158 km/h 98 mph	152 km/h 95 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost	200 hp 149 kW
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II	210 hp 157 kW

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Facelift 2022 2.2 MultiJet II has 10 hp more than Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost and Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Facelift 2022 2.2 MultiJet II: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost	320 Nm 236 lb-ft
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II	470 Nm 347 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost	1,358 kg 2,994 lb
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II	1,745 kg 3,847 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost	Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II	215 km/h 134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost	6.7 s
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II	6.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Facelift 2022 2.2 MultiJet II and Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost	6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II	6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost	147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II	120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
Vehicle	Power	Acceleration	Top speed
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost	200 hp 149 kW	6.7 s	Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II	210 hp 157 kW	6.6 s	215 km/h 134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Vehicle

Performance score

Practicality score

FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost

Power	200 hp 149 kW
0-100 km/h	6.7 s
Top speed Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	456 L 16.1 cu ft
Length	4,226 mm 166.4 in
Height	1,520 mm 59.8 in

Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II

Power	210 hp 157 kW
0-100 km/h	6.6 s
Top speed 215 km/h 134 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	525 L 18.5 cu ft
Length	4,687 mm 184.5 in
Height	1,693 mm 66.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Vehicle

Performance score

Fuel economy score

FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost

Power	200 hp 149 kW
0-100 km/h	6.7 s
Top speed Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph

6.0 L/100 km

39.2 mpg US

47.1 mpg UK

Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II

Power	210 hp 157 kW
0-100 km/h	6.6 s
Top speed 215 km/h 134 mph

6.4 L/100 km

36.8 mpg US

44.1 mpg UK

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Facelift 2022 2.2 MultiJet II is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Fuel consumption, L/100 km	0-100 km/h, s
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost	6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK	6.7 s
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II	6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK	6.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Power-to-weight, hp/t	Fuel consumption, L/100 km
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost	147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp	6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II	120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp	6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Vehicle

FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost

Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II

Power

200 hp

149 kW

210 hp

157 kW

Torque

320 Nm

236 lb-ft

470 Nm

347 lb-ft

Acceleration

6.7 s

6.6 s

Top speed

Unrestricted

230 km/h143 mph

Restricted

220 km/h137 mph

215 km/h

134 mph

Lightness

1,358 kg

2,994 lb

1,745 kg

3,847 lb

Fuel consumption

6.0 L/100 km

39.2 mpg US

47.1 mpg UK

6.4 L/100 km

36.8 mpg US

44.1 mpg UK

Practicality

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	456 L 16.1 cu ft
Length	4,226 mm 166.4 in
Height	1,520 mm 59.8 in

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	525 L 18.5 cu ft
Length	4,687 mm 184.5 in
Height	1,693 mm 66.7 in

Range score

906 km

563 mi

Trunk score

456 L

16.1 cu ft

525 L

18.5 cu ft

Power-to-weight score

147 hp/t

110 kW/t

6.8 kg/hp

120 hp/t

90 kW/t

8.3 kg/hp

Overall

Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Average annual distanceDistance unitFuel price in your local currencyPrice unit

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
Vehicle	Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost	Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Facelift 2022 2.2 MultiJet II
Consumption	6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK	6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km	10.50 LC100 km	11.20 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi	16.90 LC100 mi	18.02 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used	900 L238 US gal198 UK gal	960 L254 US gal211 UK gal
Annual fuel cost	1,575 LC/year	1,680 LC/year