Car comparison

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoostvsMercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison
200 hp1496 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSUV2020-2024
VS

Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247)

GLA 220d

190 hp1950 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2020-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph Unrestricted
    220 km/h
    137 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    200 hp
    149 kW
  • Lightest
    1,358 kg
    2,994 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    147 hp/t
    110 kW/t
    6.8 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    456 L
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best performance score
    54/100
  • Best practicality score
    81/100

Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d

  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.3 L/100 km
    44.4 mpg US
    53.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.1 L/100 km
    38.6 mpg US
    46.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.9 L/100 km
    48.0 mpg US
    57.6 mpg UK
  • Best economy score
    93/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d
Power
200hp149kW
190hp142kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,358kg2,994lb
1,595kg3,516lb
Gross weight
1,815kg4,001lb
2,190kg4,828lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Calculated
219 km/h
136 mph
To 99% top speed
68.1s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
73.7s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.7s
7.3s
0-200 km/h
27.5s
Calculated
35.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.4s
Calculated
6.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.7s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton
Calculated
251Nm/t168lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
962km598mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,496cc91cu in
1,950cc119cu in
Length
4,226mm166in
4,410mm174in
Width
1,805mm71in
1,834mm72in
Height
1,520mm60in
1,611mm63in
Wheelbase
2,588mm102in
2,729mm107in
Front track-
1,605mm63in
Rear track-
1,606mm63in
Ground clearance
152mm6in
143mm6in
Trunk volume
456L
425L
Max trunk volume
1,216L
1,420L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank-
51L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoostMercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220dPowerTorque
  • Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
  • Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost6,000 rpm2,500-3,500 rpm6,250 rpm
Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d3,800 rpm1,600-2,600 rpm4,050 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.4 s
6.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.7 s
7.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
27.5 s
35.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Likely limited
219 km/h
136 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.4 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.7 s
15.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
158 km/h
98 mph
151 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
200 hp
149 kW
Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d
190 hp
142 kW

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost has 10 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d and Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
1,358 kg
2,994 lb
Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d
1,595 kg
3,516 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d
219 km/h
136 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost6.7 s
Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d7.3 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost and Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d and Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost: 0.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
200 hp
149 kW
6.7 s
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d
190 hp
142 kW
7.3 s
219 km/h
136 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,226 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,520 mm
59.8 in
Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
425 L
15.0 cu ft
Length
4,410 mm
173.6 in
Height
1,611 mm
63.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
6.7 s
Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
7.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d
Power
200 hp
149 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.7 s
7.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
219 km/h
136 mph
Lightness
1,358 kg
2,994 lb
1,595 kg
3,516 lb
Fuel consumption
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,226 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,520 mm
59.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
425 L
15.0 cu ft
Length
4,410 mm
173.6 in
Height
1,611 mm
63.4 in
Range score
-
962 km
598 mi
Trunk score
456 L
16.1 cu ft
425 L
15.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoostMercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d
Consumption6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.50 LC100 km9.28 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.90 LC100 mi14.93 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used900 L238 US gal198 UK gal795 L210 US gal175 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,575 LC/year1,391 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Is 237 kg lighter
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 31 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d

  • Has 80 Nm more
  • Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost vs Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d - car comparison - FastVsFaster