Ford Puma
Car comparison
Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoostvsMercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GLA (H247)
GLA 220d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph Unrestricted220 km/h137 mph Restricted
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Lightest1,358 kg2,994 lb
- Best power-to-weight147 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk456 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Best economy score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,358kg2,994lb | 1,595kg3,516lb |
| Gross weight | 1,815kg4,001lb | 2,190kg4,828lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 68.1s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 73.7s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.5s Calculated | 35.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton Calculated | 251Nm/t168lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 962km598mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,496cc91cu in | 1,950cc119cu in |
| Length | 4,226mm166in | 4,410mm174in |
| Width | 1,805mm71in | 1,834mm72in |
| Height | 1,520mm60in | 1,611mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,588mm102in | 2,729mm107in |
| Front track | - | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | - | 1,606mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 152mm6in | 143mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 456L | 425L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,216L | 1,420L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | - | 51L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost | 6,000 rpm | 2,500-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d | 3,800 rpm | 1,600-2,600 rpm | 4,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.5 s | 35.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost | 200 hp 149 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d | 190 hp 142 kW |
Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost has 10 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d and Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost | 1,358 kg 2,994 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d | 219 km/h 136 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost | 6.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d | 7.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost and Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d and Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost | 200 hp 149 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.3 s | 219 km/h 136 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d |
| 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,358 kg 2,994 lb | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 962 km 598 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 456 L 16.1 cu ft | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost | Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK | 5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.50 LC100 km | 9.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi | 14.93 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal | 795 L210 US gal175 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,575 LC/year | 1,391 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 237 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 31 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d
- Has 80 Nm more
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























