Car comparison

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoostvsVolkswagen Tiguan II · Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford Puma

ST 1.5 EcoBoost

200 hp1496 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSUV2020-2024
VS

Volkswagen Tiguan II · Facelift 2020

2.0 TDI

200 hp1968 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2020-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI

  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.2 L/100 km
    45.2 mpg US
    54.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.2 L/100 km
    37.9 mpg US
    45.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.6 L/100 km
    51.1 mpg US
    61.4 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    615 L
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best economy score
    93/100
  • Best practicality score
    88/100

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph
  • Most powerful
    200 hp
    149 kW
  • Lightest
    1,358 kg
    2,994 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    147 hp/t
    110 kW/t
    6.8 kg/hp
  • Best performance score
    53/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDI
Power
200hp149kW
200hp149kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,358kg2,994lb
1,640kg3,616lb
Gross weight
1,815kg4,001lb
2,250kg4,960lb
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
216 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
69.1s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
74.3s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.7s
7.5s
0-200 km/h
32.6s
Calculated
38.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.3s
Calculated
7.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK
4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.8s
Calculated
15.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton
Calculated
244Nm/t163lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
1,115km693mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,496cc91cu in
1,968cc120cu in
Length
4,226mm166in
4,509mm178in
Width-
1,839mm72in
Height
1,520mm60in
1,675mm66in
Wheelbase
2,588mm102in
2,679mm105in
Front track-
1,586mm62in
Rear track-
1,576mm62in
Ground clearance
152mm6in
-
Trunk volume
456L
615L
Max trunk volume
1,216L
1,655L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank-
58L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoostVolkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TDIPowerTorque
  • Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost6,000 rpm2,500-3,500 rpm6,250 rpm
VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDI-1,750-3,500 rpm3,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.3 s
7.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.7 s
7.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
32.6 s
38.7 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
216 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.6 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.4 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.8 s
15.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
154 km/h
96 mph
149 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
200 hp
149 kW
VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDI
200 hp
149 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
1,358 kg
2,994 lb
VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDI
1,640 kg
3,616 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
220 km/h
137 mph
VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDI
216 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost6.7 s
VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDI7.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost and Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDI
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI and Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost: 0.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDI
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
200 hp
149 kW
6.7 s
220 km/h
137 mph
VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDI
200 hp
149 kW
7.5 s
216 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,226 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,520 mm
59.8 in
VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
615 L
21.7 cu ft
Length
4,509 mm
177.5 in
Height
1,675 mm
65.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
6.7 s
VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDI
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
7.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDI
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.7 s
7.5 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
216 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,358 kg
2,994 lb
1,640 kg
3,616 lb
Fuel consumption
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,226 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,520 mm
59.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
615 L
21.7 cu ft
Length
4,509 mm
177.5 in
Height
1,675 mm
65.9 in
Range score
-
1,115 km
693 mi
Trunk score
456 L
16.1 cu ft
615 L
21.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoostVolkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI
Consumption6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.50 LC100 km9.10 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.90 LC100 mi14.65 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used900 L238 US gal198 UK gal780 L206 US gal172 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,575 LC/year1,365 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost

  • Is 282 kg lighter
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 25 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI

  • Has 80 Nm more
  • Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 159 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

ST 1.5 EcoBoost
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostvsFordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDIvsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostvsFordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDIvsVolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
40 TDI
VS
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
2.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDIvsVolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
2.0 TSI
VS
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostvsCupraFormentor2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDIvsVolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
2.2 MultiJet II
VS
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostvsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II
2.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDIvsVolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
40 TDI
VS
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI
2.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDIvsVolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI
Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost vs Volkswagen Tiguan II · Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI - car comparison - FastVsFaster