Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) · Facelift 2022
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) · Facelift 2022 2.2 MultiJet IIvsAlfa Romeo Tonale · Facelift 2025 1.5 VGT
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Tonale · Facelift 2025
1.5 VGT
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Facelift 2022 2.2 MultiJet II
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Fastest top speed215 km/h134 mph
- Most powerful210 hp157 kW
- Highest torque470 Nm347 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight120 hp/t90 kW/t8.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk525 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Alfa Romeo Tonale Facelift 2025 1.5 VGT
- Lightest1,525 kg3,362 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range932 km579 mi
- Best economy score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II | Alfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 210hp157kW | 160hp119kW |
| Torque | 470Nm347lb-ft | 240Nm177lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,745kg3,847lb | 1,525kg3,362lb |
| Gross weight | 2,410kg5,313lb | 2,135kg4,707lb |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.2s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 85.4s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 36.7s Calculated | 49.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 120hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 269Nm/t180lb-ft/ton Calculated | 157Nm/t105lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 906km563mi Calculated | 932km579mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,143cc131cu in | 1,469cc90cu in |
| Length | 4,687mm185in | 4,522mm178in |
| Width | 1,903mm75in | 1,841mm72in |
| Height | 1,693mm67in | 1,601mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,818mm111in | 2,636mm104in |
| Front track | 1,627mm64in | - |
| Rear track | 1,674mm66in | - |
| Ground clearance | - | 156mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 525L | 500L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,600L | 1,550L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II | Alfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 36.7 s | 49.2 s |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 95 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II | 210 hp 157 kW |
| Alfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT | 160 hp 119 kW |
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Facelift 2022 2.2 MultiJet II has 50 hp more than Alfa Romeo Tonale Facelift 2025 1.5 VGT.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Tonale Facelift 2025 1.5 VGT and Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Facelift 2022 2.2 MultiJet II: 50 hp (37 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb |
| Alfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT | 1,525 kg 3,362 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Alfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT | 212 km/h 132 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II | 6.6 s |
| Alfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Facelift 2022 2.2 MultiJet II and Alfa Romeo Tonale Facelift 2025 1.5 VGT: 1.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Tonale Facelift 2025 1.5 VGT and Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Facelift 2022 2.2 MultiJet II: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II | 906 km 563 mi |
| Alfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT | 932 km 579 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II | 210 hp 157 kW | 6.6 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Alfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT | 160 hp 119 kW | 8.5 s | 212 km/h 132 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Facelift 2022 2.2 MultiJet II is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
| Alfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II | Alfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 210 hp 157 kW | 160 hp 119 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb | 1,525 kg 3,362 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 906 km 563 mi | 932 km 579 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 525 L 18.5 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Facelift 2022 2.2 MultiJet II | Alfa Romeo Tonale Facelift 2025 1.5 VGT |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.20 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,680 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) Facelift 2022 2.2 MultiJet II
- Has 50 hp more
- Has 230 Nm more
- Is 1.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Alfa Romeo Tonale Facelift 2025 1.5 VGT
- Is 220 kg lighter
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 26 km (16 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























