Car comparison

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoostvsJaguar E-Pace · Facelift 2020 1.5i P300e

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford Puma

ST 1.5 EcoBoost

200 hp1496 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSUV2020-2024
VS

Jaguar E-Pace · Facelift 2020

1.5i P300e

200 hp1498 ccHybridAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2020-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost

  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph Unrestricted
    220 km/h
    137 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    200 hp
    149 kW
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,358 kg
    2,994 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    147 hp/t
    110 kW/t
    6.8 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best performance score
    54/100

Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 1.5i P300e

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.5 s
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    2.0 L/100 km
    117.6 mpg US
    141.2 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    494 L
  • Best economy score
    100/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e
Power
200hp149kW
200hp149kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
280Nm207lb-ft
Curb weight
1,358kg2,994lb
2,098kg4,625lb
Gross weight
1,815kg4,001lb
2,670kg5,886lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Calculated
216 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
68.1s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
80.2s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.7s
6.5s
0-200 km/h
27.5s
Calculated
39.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.4s
Calculated
6.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
2L/100 km117.6mpg US141.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
14.7s
Calculated
14.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
95hp/t71kW/t43hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton
Calculated
133Nm/t89lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
2,880km1,790mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,496cc91cu in
1,498cc91cu in
Length
4,226mm166in
4,395mm173in
Width
1,805mm71in
1,984mm78in
Height
1,520mm60in
1,648mm65in
Wheelbase
2,588mm102in
2,681mm106in
Front track-
1,625mm64in
Rear track-
1,624mm64in
Ground clearance
152mm6in
212mm8in
Trunk volume
456L
494L
Max trunk volume
1,216L
1,170L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank-
58L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoostJaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 1.5i P300ePowerTorque
  • Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 1.5i P300e: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost6,000 rpm2,500-3,500 rpm6,250 rpm
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e5,500 rpm1,600-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.4 s
6.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.7 s
6.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
27.5 s
39.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Likely limited
216 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
9.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.4 s
12.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.7 s
14.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
158 km/h
98 mph
150 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
200 hp
149 kW
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e
200 hp
149 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e
280 Nm
207 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
1,358 kg
2,994 lb
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e
2,098 kg
4,625 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e
216 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost6.7 s
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e6.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 1.5i P300e and Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e
2.0 L/100 km
117.6 mpg US
141.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 1.5i P300e and Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost: 4.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e
95 hp/t
71 kW/t
10.5 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
200 hp
149 kW
6.7 s
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e
200 hp
149 kW
6.5 s
216 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,226 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,520 mm
59.8 in
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
494 L
17.4 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,648 mm
64.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
2.0 L/100 km
117.6 mpg US
141.2 mpg UK

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
6.7 s
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e
2.0 L/100 km
117.6 mpg US
141.2 mpg UK
6.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e
95 hp/t
71 kW/t
10.5 kg/hp
2.0 L/100 km
117.6 mpg US
141.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e
Power
200 hp
149 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.7 s
6.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
216 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,358 kg
2,994 lb
2,098 kg
4,625 lb
Fuel consumption
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
2.0 L/100 km
117.6 mpg US
141.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,226 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,520 mm
59.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
494 L
17.4 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,648 mm
64.9 in
Range score
-
2,880 km
1,790 mi
Trunk score
456 L
16.1 cu ft
494 L
17.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
95 hp/t
71 kW/t
10.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoostJaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 1.5i P300e
Consumption6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK2 L/100 km117.6 mpg US141.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.50 LC100 km3.50 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.90 LC100 mi5.63 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used900 L238 US gal198 UK gal300 L79 US gal66 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,575 LC/year525.00 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost

  • Has 40 Nm more
  • Is 740 kg lighter
  • Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 52 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 1.5i P300e

  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 4.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 38 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost
Jaguar E-Pace 1.5i P300e
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

ST 1.5 EcoBoost
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostvsFordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1.5i P300e
2.0 P200
VS
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300evsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostvsFordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
1.5i P300e
2.0d
VS
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300evsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
40 TDI
VS
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
1.5i P300e
20d
VS
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300evsJaguarF-Pace20d
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
2.0 TSI
VS
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostvsCupraFormentor2.0 TSI
1.5i P300e
2.0 TDI
VS
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300evsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDI
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
2.2 MultiJet II
VS
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostvsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II
1.5i P300e
2.0 TDI
VS
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300evsSeatTarraco2.0 TDI
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
40 TDI
VS
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
Standard Range 50 kWh
VS
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoostvsTeslaModel YStandard Range 50 kWh
Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost vs Jaguar E-Pace · Facelift 2020 1.5i P300e - car comparison - FastVsFaster