Tesla Model Y
Car comparison
Tesla Model Y Standard Range 50 kWhvsFord Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Puma
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Tesla Model Y Standard Range 50 kWh
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph Unrestricted217 km/h135 mph Restricted
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Largest trunk854 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best practicality score91/100
Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Lightest1,358 kg2,994 lb
- Best power-to-weight147 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Best economy score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | TeslaModel YStandard Range 50 kWh | FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,844kg4,065lb | 1,358kg2,994lb |
| Gross weight | 2,369kg5,223lb | 1,815kg4,001lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 217 km/h135 mph Calculated | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.4s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 69.1s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.5s Calculated | 32.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 111hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 190Nm/t127lb-ft/ton Calculated | 236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Displacement | - | 1,496cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,750mm187in | 4,226mm166in |
| Width | 1,920mm76in | - |
| Height | 1,624mm64in | 1,520mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,890mm114in | 2,588mm102in |
| Front track | 1,636mm64in | - |
| Rear track | 1,636mm64in | - |
| Ground clearance | 167mm7in | 152mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 854L | 456L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,041L | 1,216L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | TeslaModel YStandard Range 50 kWh | FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.5 s | 32.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 217 km/h135 mph Likely limited | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 96 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel YStandard Range 50 kWh | 204 hp 152 kW |
| FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost | 200 hp 149 kW |
Tesla Model Y Standard Range 50 kWh has 4 hp more than Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost.
The biggest power difference is between Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost and Tesla Model Y Standard Range 50 kWh: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel YStandard Range 50 kWh | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel YStandard Range 50 kWh | 1,844 kg 4,065 lb |
| FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost | 1,358 kg 2,994 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel YStandard Range 50 kWh | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 217 km/h135 mph |
| FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel YStandard Range 50 kWh | 6.9 s |
| FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost | 6.7 s |
Although Tesla Model Y Standard Range 50 kWh has more power, Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost and Tesla Model Y Standard Range 50 kWh: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel YStandard Range 50 kWh | 111 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp |
| FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| TeslaModel YStandard Range 50 kWh | 204 hp 152 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 217 km/h135 mph |
| FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost | 200 hp 149 kW | 6.7 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TeslaModel YStandard Range 50 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | TeslaModel YStandard Range 50 kWh | FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 217 km/h135 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,844 kg 4,065 lb | 1,358 kg 2,994 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 854 L 30.2 cu ft | 456 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 111 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,575 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Tesla Model Y Standard Range 50 kWh
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 398 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost
- Is 486 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 37 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























