Car comparison

Tesla Model Y Standard Range 50 kWhvsFord Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison
VS
200 hp1496 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSUV2020-2024

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Tesla Model Y Standard Range 50 kWh

  • Fastest top speed
    225 km/h
    140 mph Unrestricted
    217 km/h
    135 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    204 hp
    152 kW
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    854 L
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best performance score
    53/100
  • Best practicality score
    91/100

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.7 s
  • Lightest
    1,358 kg
    2,994 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    147 hp/t
    110 kW/t
    6.8 kg/hp
  • Best economy score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelTeslaModel YStandard Range 50 kWhFordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
Power
204hp152kW
200hp149kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,844kg4,065lb
1,358kg2,994lb
Gross weight
2,369kg5,223lb
1,815kg4,001lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
217 km/h135 mph
Calculated
220 km/h
137 mph
To 99% top speed
70.4s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
69.1s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.9s
6.7s
0-200 km/h
30.5s
Calculated
32.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.5s
Calculated
6.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption-
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.9s
Calculated
14.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
111hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb
Calculated
147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
190Nm/t127lb-ft/ton
Calculated
236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Displacement-
1,496cc91cu in
Length
4,750mm187in
4,226mm166in
Width
1,920mm76in
-
Height
1,624mm64in
1,520mm60in
Wheelbase
2,890mm114in
2,588mm102in
Front track
1,636mm64in
-
Rear track
1,636mm64in
-
Ground clearance
167mm7in
152mm6in
Trunk volume
854L
456L
Max trunk volume
2,041L
1,216L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricTeslaModel YStandard Range 50 kWhFordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.5 s
6.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.9 s
6.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
30.5 s
32.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
217 km/h135 mph
Likely limited
220 km/h
137 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.8 s
9.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.6 s
12.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.9 s
14.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
155 km/h
96 mph
154 km/h
96 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
TeslaModel YStandard Range 50 kWh
204 hp
152 kW
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
200 hp
149 kW

Tesla Model Y Standard Range 50 kWh has 4 hp more than Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost and Tesla Model Y Standard Range 50 kWh: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
TeslaModel YStandard Range 50 kWh
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
TeslaModel YStandard Range 50 kWh
1,844 kg
4,065 lb
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
1,358 kg
2,994 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
TeslaModel YStandard Range 50 kWh
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
217 km/h135 mph
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
220 km/h
137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
TeslaModel YStandard Range 50 kWh6.9 s
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost6.7 s

Although Tesla Model Y Standard Range 50 kWh has more power, Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost and Tesla Model Y Standard Range 50 kWh: 0.2 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
TeslaModel YStandard Range 50 kWh
111 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
TeslaModel YStandard Range 50 kWh
204 hp
152 kW
6.9 s
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
217 km/h135 mph
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
200 hp
149 kW
6.7 s
220 km/h
137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
TeslaModel YStandard Range 50 kWh
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
217 km/h135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
854 L
30.2 cu ft
Length
4,750 mm
187.0 in
Height
1,624 mm
63.9 in
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,226 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,520 mm
59.8 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleTeslaModel YStandard Range 50 kWhFordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
Power
204 hp
152 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.9 s
6.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
217 km/h135 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Lightness
1,844 kg
4,065 lb
1,358 kg
2,994 lb
Fuel consumption
-
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
854 L
30.2 cu ft
Length
4,750 mm
187.0 in
Height
1,624 mm
63.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,226 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,520 mm
59.8 in
Trunk score
854 L
30.2 cu ft
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
111 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost
Consumption6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.50 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.90 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used900 L238 US gal198 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,575 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Tesla Model Y Standard Range 50 kWh

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Has 30 Nm more
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 398 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost

  • Is 486 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 37 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Tesla Model Y Standard Range 50 kWh
Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Tesla Model Y Standard Range 50 kWh vs Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost - car comparison - FastVsFaster