Car comparison

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0vsMitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII

2.0

265 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSedan2003-2005
VS

Mitsubishi Lancer IX

Ralliart 2.0

240 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2009-2011

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    245 km/h
    152 mph
  • Most powerful
    265 hp
    198 kW
  • Highest torque
    355 Nm
    262 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    183 hp/t
    137 kW/t
    5.5 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best performance score
    61/100

Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0

  • Lightest
    1,365 kg
    3,009 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.4 L/100 km
    28.0 mpg US
    33.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.5 L/100 km
    22.4 mpg US
    26.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.4 L/100 km
    36.8 mpg US
    44.1 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    702 km
    436 mi
  • Best economy score
    84/100
  • Best practicality score
    78/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
Power
265hp198kW
240hp179kW
Torque
355Nm262lb-ft
309Nm228lb-ft
Curb weight
1,445kg3,186lb
1,365kg3,009lb
Gross weight
1,885kg4,156lb
1,850kg4,079lb
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
54.9s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph
Calculated
61.4s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.1s
7.0s
0-200 km/h
20.0s
Calculated
23.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.8s
Calculated
6.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK
10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.1s
Calculated
14.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
183hp/t137kW/t83hp/1000 lb
Calculated
176hp/t131kW/t80hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
246Nm/t164lb-ft/ton
Calculated
226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
505km314mi
Calculated
702km436mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,490mm177in
4,570mm180in
Width
1,770mm70in
1,760mm69in
Height
1,450mm57in
1,505mm59in
Wheelbase
2,625mm103in
2,635mm104in
Front track
1,515mm60in
1,530mm60in
Rear track
1,515mm60in
1,530mm60in
Ground clearance
140mm6in
-
Trunk volume
430L
-
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
59L
CO2 emissions
258g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0PowerTorque
  • Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.06,500 rpm3,500 rpm6,750 rpm
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.06,000 rpm3,500 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.8 s
6.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.1 s
7.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
20.0 s
23.6 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.4 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.0 s
12.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.1 s
14.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
171 km/h
106 mph
163 km/h
101 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
265 hp
198 kW
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
240 hp
179 kW

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 has 25 hp more than Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0 and Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0: 25 hp (19 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
355 Nm
262 lb-ft
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
309 Nm
228 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
1,445 kg
3,186 lb
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
1,365 kg
3,009 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
245 km/h
152 mph
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.06.1 s
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.07.0 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 and Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0: 0.9 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0 and Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0: 2.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
183 hp/t
137 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
176 hp/t
131 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
505 km
314 mi
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
702 km
436 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
265 hp
198 kW
6.1 s
245 km/h
152 mph
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
240 hp
179 kW
7.0 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,490 mm
176.8 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,570 mm
179.9 in
Height
1,505 mm
59.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
6.1 s
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
7.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
183 hp/t
137 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
176 hp/t
131 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
Power
265 hp
198 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
355 Nm
262 lb-ft
309 Nm
228 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.1 s
7.0 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Lightness
1,445 kg
3,186 lb
1,365 kg
3,009 lb
Fuel consumption
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,490 mm
176.8 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,570 mm
179.9 in
Height
1,505 mm
59.3 in
Range score
505 km
314 mi
702 km
436 mi
CO2 score
258 g/km
-
Trunk score
430 L
15.2 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
183 hp/t
137 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
176 hp/t
131 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0
Consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km19.08 LC100 km14.70 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi30.70 LC100 mi23.66 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,861 LC/year2,205 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0

  • Has 25 hp more
  • Has 46 Nm more
  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0

  • Is 80 kg lighter
  • Uses 2.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 198 km (123 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0
Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0
2.0 T
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T
Ralliart 2.0
2.0 T5
VS
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0vsVolvoS60 II2.0 T5
2.0
2.0
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0
Ralliart 2.0
3.5i V6 24V
VS
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0vsNissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V
2.0
2.0
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0
Ralliart 2.0
3.5 V6
VS
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0vsRenaultLatitude3.5 V6
2.0
2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
Ralliart 2.0
2.5 T5
VS
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0vsVolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5
2.0
3.2 i V6 24V
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsAcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V
Ralliart 2.0
3.3 V6
VS
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0vsHyundaiSonata V (NF)Facelift 20083.3 V6
2.0
430 V8
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsLexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8
Ralliart 2.0
3.2 V6 FSI
VS
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0vsVolkswagenPassat (B6)3.2 V6 FSI
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 vs Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster