Car comparison

Volvo S60 II 2.0 T5vsMitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo S60 II

2.0 T5

240 hp1999 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSedan2010-2013
VS

Mitsubishi Lancer IX

Ralliart 2.0

240 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2009-2011

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.0 s
  • Lightest
    1,365 kg
    3,009 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    176 hp/t
    131 kW/t
    5.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.5 L/100 km
    22.4 mpg US
    26.9 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best performance score
    56/100
  • Best practicality score
    78/100

Volvo S60 II 2.0 T5

  • Fastest top speed
    245 km/h
    152 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    240 hp
    179 kW
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.9 L/100 km
    29.8 mpg US
    35.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.2 L/100 km
    37.9 mpg US
    45.6 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    854 km
    531 mi
  • Best economy score
    86/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoS60 II2.0 T5MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
Power
240hp179kW
240hp179kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
309Nm228lb-ft
Curb weight
1,542kg3,400lb
1,365kg3,009lb
Gross weight
2,040kg4,497lb
1,850kg4,079lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
69.3s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph
Calculated
61.4s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.3s
7.0s
0-200 km/h
24.6s
Calculated
23.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.0s
Calculated
6.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK
10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.2s
Calculated
14.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
156hp/t116kW/t71hp/1000 lb
Calculated
176hp/t131kW/t80hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton
Calculated
226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
854km531mi
Calculated
702km436mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,999cc122cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,628mm182in
4,570mm180in
Width
1,865mm73in
1,760mm69in
Height
1,484mm58in
1,505mm59in
Wheelbase
2,776mm109in
2,635mm104in
Front track
1,588mm63in
1,530mm60in
Rear track
1,585mm62in
1,530mm60in
Ground clearance
136mm5in
-
Trunk volume
380L
-
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
68L
59L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo S60 II 2.0 T5Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0PowerTorque
  • Volvo S60 II 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
  • Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoS60 II2.0 T55,500 rpm1,800-5,000 rpm5,750 rpm
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.06,000 rpm3,500 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoS60 II2.0 T5MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.0 s
6.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.3 s
7.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
24.6 s
23.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
12.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.2 s
14.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
160 km/h
100 mph
163 km/h
101 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 II2.0 T5
240 hp
179 kW
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
240 hp
179 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 II2.0 T5
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
309 Nm
228 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 II2.0 T5
1,542 kg
3,400 lb
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
1,365 kg
3,009 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 II2.0 T5
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 II2.0 T57.3 s
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.07.0 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0 and Volvo S60 II 2.0 T5: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 II2.0 T5
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S60 II 2.0 T5 and Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0: 0.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 II2.0 T5
156 hp/t
116 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
176 hp/t
131 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 II2.0 T5
854 km
531 mi
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
702 km
436 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoS60 II2.0 T5
240 hp
179 kW
7.3 s
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
240 hp
179 kW
7.0 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoS60 II2.0 T5
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,628 mm
182.2 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,570 mm
179.9 in
Height
1,505 mm
59.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoS60 II2.0 T5
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoS60 II2.0 T5
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
7.3 s
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
7.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoS60 II2.0 T5
156 hp/t
116 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
176 hp/t
131 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoS60 II2.0 T5MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
309 Nm
228 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.3 s
7.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
245 km/h152 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Lightness
1,542 kg
3,400 lb
1,365 kg
3,009 lb
Fuel consumption
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,628 mm
182.2 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,570 mm
179.9 in
Height
1,505 mm
59.3 in
Range score
854 km
531 mi
702 km
436 mi
Trunk score
380 L
13.4 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
156 hp/t
116 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
176 hp/t
131 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo S60 II 2.0 T5Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0
Consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.83 LC100 km14.70 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.25 LC100 mi23.66 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,074 LC/year2,205 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo S60 II 2.0 T5

  • Has 11 Nm more
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 152 km (94 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0

  • Is 177 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo S60 II 2.0 T5
Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 T5
2.4 D5
VS
VolvoS60 II2.0 T5vsVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
Ralliart 2.0
2.0
VS
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
2.0 T5
2.4i T5 20V
VS
VolvoS60 II2.0 T5vsVolvoS602.4i T5 20V
Ralliart 2.0
3.5i V6 24V
VS
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0vsNissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V
2.0 T5
2.5 T5
VS
VolvoS60 II2.0 T5vsVolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5
Ralliart 2.0
3.5 V6
VS
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0vsRenaultLatitude3.5 V6
2.0 T5
2.5
VS
VolvoS60 II2.0 T5vsVolvoS40 II2.5
Ralliart 2.0
3.3 V6
VS
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0vsHyundaiSonata V (NF)Facelift 20083.3 V6
2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoS60 II2.0 T5vsVolvoS902.0 T5
Ralliart 2.0
3.2 V6 FSI
VS
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0vsVolkswagenPassat (B6)3.2 V6 FSI
2.0 T5
3.5 V6
VS
VolvoS60 II2.0 T5vsToyotaCamry VII (XV50)3.5 V6
Ralliart 2.0
2.5 GT
VS
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0vsSubaruLegacy V2.5 GT
Volvo S60 II 2.0 T5 vs Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster