Volvo S60 II
Car comparison
Volvo S60 II 2.0 T5vsToyota Camry VII (XV50) 3.5 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonToyota Camry VII (XV50)
3.5 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Toyota Camry VII (XV50) 3.5 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Most powerful249 hp186 kW
- Highest torque346 Nm255 lb-ft
- Largest trunk506 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Volvo S60 II 2.0 T5
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,542 kg3,400 lb
- Best power-to-weight156 hp/t116 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS60 II2.0 T5 | ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 249hp186kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 346Nm255lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,542kg3,400lb | 1,615kg3,560lb |
| Gross weight | 2,040kg4,497lb | 2,100kg4,630lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 69.3s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 56.2s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.6s Calculated | 31.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 156hp/t116kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 854km531mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 3,456cc211cu in |
| Length | 4,628mm182in | 4,825mm190in |
| Width | 1,865mm73in | 1,825mm72in |
| Height | 1,484mm58in | 1,480mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,776mm109in | 2,775mm109in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,575mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,585mm62in | 1,565mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 136mm5in | 160mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 380L | 506L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S60 II 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
- Toyota Camry VII (XV50) 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.0 T5 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-5,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)3.5 V6 | 6,200 rpm | 4,700 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS60 II2.0 T5 | ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.6 s | 31.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 100 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.0 T5 | 240 hp 179 kW |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)3.5 V6 | 249 hp 186 kW |
Toyota Camry VII (XV50) 3.5 V6 has 9 hp more than Volvo S60 II 2.0 T5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S60 II 2.0 T5 and Toyota Camry VII (XV50) 3.5 V6: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.0 T5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)3.5 V6 | 346 Nm 255 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.0 T5 | 1,542 kg 3,400 lb |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)3.5 V6 | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.0 T5 | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)3.5 V6 | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.0 T5 | 7.3 s |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)3.5 V6 | 7.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Toyota Camry VII (XV50) 3.5 V6 and Volvo S60 II 2.0 T5: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.0 T5 | 156 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)3.5 V6 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.0 T5 | 240 hp 179 kW | 7.3 s | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)3.5 V6 | 249 hp 186 kW | 7.1 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.0 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)3.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS60 II2.0 T5 | ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)3.5 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 249 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 346 Nm 255 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,542 kg 3,400 lb | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 854 km 531 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 506 L 17.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 156 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S60 II 2.0 T5 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,074 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S60 II 2.0 T5
- Is 73 kg lighter
- Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Toyota Camry VII (XV50) 3.5 V6
- Has 9 hp more
- Has 26 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 126 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























