Mitsubishi Lancer IX
Car comparison
Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0vsRenault Latitude 3.5 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Latitude
3.5 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Lightest1,365 kg3,009 lb
- Best power-to-weight176 hp/t131 kW/t5.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range702 km436 mi
- Best overall score63/100
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Renault Latitude 3.5 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Highest torque330 Nm243 lb-ft
- Best performance score57/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0 | RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 309Nm228lb-ft | 330Nm243lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,365kg3,009lb | 1,615kg3,560lb |
| Gross weight | 1,850kg4,079lb | 2,180kg4,806lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 61.4s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 57.9s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.0s | 6.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.6s Calculated | 23.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK | 15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 176hp/t131kW/t80hp/1000 lb Calculated | 149hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated | 204Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 702km436mi Calculated | 667km414mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 3,498cc213cu in |
| Length | 4,570mm180in | 4,897mm193in |
| Width | 1,760mm69in | 1,832mm72in |
| Height | 1,505mm59in | 1,483mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,635mm104in | 2,762mm109in |
| Front track | 1,530mm60in | 1,565mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,530mm60in | 1,562mm61in |
| Trunk volume | - | 477L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 511L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 59L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 250g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0: Power / Torque
- Renault Latitude 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0 | 6,000 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 6,000 rpm | 4,200 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0 | RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.0 s | 6.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.6 s | 23.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 101 mph | 165 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0 | 240 hp 179 kW |
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 240 hp 179 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0 | 309 Nm 228 lb-ft |
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0 | 1,365 kg 3,009 lb |
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0 | 7.0 s |
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 6.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Latitude 3.5 V6 and Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0 and Renault Latitude 3.5 V6: 2.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0 | 176 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp |
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0 | 702 km 436 mi |
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 667 km 414 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0 | 240 hp 179 kW | 7.0 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.4 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0 |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 |
| 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0 | 176 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0 | RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 309 Nm 228 lb-ft | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.0 s | 6.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,365 kg 3,009 lb | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 702 km 436 mi | 667 km 414 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 250 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 477 L 16.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 176 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0 | Renault Latitude 3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.70 LC100 km | 18.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi | 29.57 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal | 1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,205 LC/year | 2,756 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0
- Is 250 kg lighter
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 36 km (22 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Renault Latitude 3.5 V6
- Has 21 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























