Volkswagen Phaeton Long · Facelift 2010
Car comparison
Volkswagen Phaeton Long · Facelift 2010 3.0 V6 TDIvsRenault Latitude 3.5 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Latitude
3.5 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Phaeton Long Facelift 2010 3.0 V6 TDI
- Fastest top speed237 km/h147 mph
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,059 km658 mi
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Renault Latitude 3.5 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Lightest1,615 kg3,560 lb
- Best power-to-weight149 hp/t111 kW/t6.7 kg/hp
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score57/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI | RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 330Nm243lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,240kg4,938lb | 1,615kg3,560lb |
| Gross weight | 2,830kg6,239lb | 2,180kg4,806lb |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 88.1s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 57.9s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.6s | 6.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.7s Calculated | 23.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.2s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK | 15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 107hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 149hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 223Nm/t149lb-ft/ton Calculated | 204Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,059km658mi Calculated | 667km414mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,967cc181cu in | 3,498cc213cu in |
| Length | 5,179mm204in | 4,897mm193in |
| Width | 1,903mm75in | 1,832mm72in |
| Height | 1,450mm57in | 1,483mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 3,001mm118in | 2,762mm109in |
| Front track | 1,630mm64in | 1,565mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,617mm64in | 1,562mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 120mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 477L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 511L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 250g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Phaeton Long Facelift 2010 3.0 V6 TDI: Power / Torque
- Renault Latitude 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 6,000 rpm | 4,200 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI | RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.2 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.6 s | 6.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.7 s | 23.1 s |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.3 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.7 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 165 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI | 240 hp 179 kW |
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 240 hp 179 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI | 2,240 kg 4,938 lb |
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI | 8.6 s |
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 6.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Latitude 3.5 V6 and Volkswagen Phaeton Long Facelift 2010 3.0 V6 TDI: 2.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Phaeton Long Facelift 2010 3.0 V6 TDI and Renault Latitude 3.5 V6: 2.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp |
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI | 1,059 km 658 mi |
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 667 km 414 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI | 240 hp 179 kW | 8.6 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.4 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI |
| 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 |
| 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Renault Latitude 3.5 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI | RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.6 s | 6.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,240 kg 4,938 lb | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,059 km 658 mi | 667 km 414 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 250 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 477 L 16.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Phaeton Long Facelift 2010 3.0 V6 TDI | Renault Latitude 3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.88 LC100 km | 18.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.94 LC100 mi | 29.57 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal | 1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,231 LC/year | 2,756 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Phaeton Long Facelift 2010 3.0 V6 TDI
- Has 170 Nm more
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 392 km (244 mi) more estimated range
- Has 23 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Renault Latitude 3.5 V6
- Is 625 kg lighter
- Is 2.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 41 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























