Volvo S60 II
Car comparison
Volvo S60 II 2.0 T5vsRenault Latitude 3.5 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Latitude
3.5 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S60 II 2.0 T5
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Lightest1,542 kg3,400 lb
- Best power-to-weight156 hp/t116 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range854 km531 mi
- Best economy score86/100
Renault Latitude 3.5 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Highest torque330 Nm243 lb-ft
- Largest trunk477 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS60 II2.0 T5 | RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 330Nm243lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,542kg3,400lb | 1,615kg3,560lb |
| Gross weight | 2,040kg4,497lb | 2,180kg4,806lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 69.3s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 57.9s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 6.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.6s Calculated | 23.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 156hp/t116kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated | 149hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated | 204Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 854km531mi Calculated | 667km414mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 3,498cc213cu in |
| Length | 4,628mm182in | 4,897mm193in |
| Width | 1,865mm73in | 1,832mm72in |
| Height | 1,484mm58in | 1,483mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,776mm109in | 2,762mm109in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,565mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,585mm62in | 1,562mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 136mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 380L | 477L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 511L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 250g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S60 II 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
- Renault Latitude 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.0 T5 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-5,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 6,000 rpm | 4,200 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS60 II2.0 T5 | RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 6.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.6 s | 23.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 100 mph | 165 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.0 T5 | 240 hp 179 kW |
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 240 hp 179 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.0 T5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.0 T5 | 1,542 kg 3,400 lb |
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.0 T5 | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.0 T5 | 7.3 s |
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 6.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Latitude 3.5 V6 and Volvo S60 II 2.0 T5: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.0 T5 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S60 II 2.0 T5 and Renault Latitude 3.5 V6: 2.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.0 T5 | 156 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.0 T5 | 854 km 531 mi |
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 667 km 414 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.0 T5 | 240 hp 179 kW | 7.3 s | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.4 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.0 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.0 T5 |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 |
| 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo S60 II 2.0 T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.0 T5 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 II2.0 T5 | 156 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS60 II2.0 T5 | RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 6.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,542 kg 3,400 lb | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 854 km 531 mi | 667 km 414 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 250 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 477 L 16.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 156 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S60 II 2.0 T5 | Renault Latitude 3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.83 LC100 km | 18.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi | 29.57 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal | 1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,074 LC/year | 2,756 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S60 II 2.0 T5
- Is 73 kg lighter
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 188 km (117 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Smallest trunk
Renault Latitude 3.5 V6
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 97 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























