Renault Latitude
Car comparison
Renault Latitude 3.5 V6vsVolvo S40 II · Facelift 2007 2.5 T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S40 II · Facelift 2007
2.5 T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Latitude 3.5 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Highest torque330 Nm243 lb-ft
- Largest trunk477 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Volvo S40 II Facelift 2007 2.5 T5
- Lightest1,485 kg3,274 lb
- Best power-to-weight155 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.5 L/100 km17.4 mpg US20.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions211 g/km
- Best estimated range689 km428 mi
- Best economy score83/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 230hp172kW |
| Torque | 330Nm243lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,615kg3,560lb | 1,485kg3,274lb |
| Gross weight | 2,180kg4,806lb | 1,960kg4,321lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 57.9s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 63.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.4s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.1s Calculated | 25.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK | 13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 149hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 155hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 204Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 667km414mi Calculated | 689km428mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,498cc213cu in | 2,521cc154cu in |
| Length | 4,897mm193in | 4,476mm176in |
| Width | 1,832mm72in | 1,770mm70in |
| Height | 1,483mm58in | 1,454mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,762mm109in | 2,640mm104in |
| Front track | 1,565mm62in | 1,535mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | 1,531mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 477L | 404L |
| Max trunk volume | 511L | 883L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 62L |
| CO2 emissions | 250g/km | 211g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Latitude 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
- Volvo S40 II Facelift 2007 2.5 T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 6,000 rpm | 4,200 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-5,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.4 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.1 s | 25.5 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 165 km/h 102 mph | 160 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 240 hp 179 kW |
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 230 hp 172 kW |
Renault Latitude 3.5 V6 has 10 hp more than Volvo S40 II Facelift 2007 2.5 T5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S40 II Facelift 2007 2.5 T5 and Renault Latitude 3.5 V6: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb |
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 1,485 kg 3,274 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 6.4 s |
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Latitude 3.5 V6 and Volvo S40 II Facelift 2007 2.5 T5: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S40 II Facelift 2007 2.5 T5 and Renault Latitude 3.5 V6: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 667 km 414 mi |
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 689 km 428 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.4 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 230 hp 172 kW | 7.2 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 |
| 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 |
| 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Renault Latitude 3.5 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 230 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.4 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb | 1,485 kg 3,274 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 667 km 414 mi | 689 km 428 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 250 g/km | 211 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 477 L 16.8 cu ft | 404 L 14.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Latitude 3.5 V6 | Volvo S40 II Facelift 2007 2.5 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK | 9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.38 LC100 km | 15.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.57 LC100 mi | 25.35 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal | 1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,756 LC/year | 2,363 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Latitude 3.5 V6
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 73 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo S40 II Facelift 2007 2.5 T5
- Is 130 kg lighter
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 22 km (14 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 39 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























