Volvo S40 II · Facelift 2007
Car comparison
Volvo S40 II · Facelift 2007 2.5 T5vsRenault Latitude 3.0 V6 dCi
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Latitude
3.0 V6 dCi
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Latitude 3.0 V6 dCi
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.0 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range972 km604 mi
- Largest trunk477 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Volvo S40 II Facelift 2007 2.5 T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Lightest1,485 kg3,274 lb
- Best power-to-weight155 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 230hp172kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,485kg3,274lb | 1,730kg3,814lb |
| Gross weight | 1,960kg4,321lb | 2,250kg4,960lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 63.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 69.9s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.5s Calculated | 28.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 155hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 139hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated | 260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 689km428mi Calculated | 972km604mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,521cc154cu in | 2,998cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,476mm176in | 4,897mm193in |
| Width | 1,770mm70in | 1,832mm72in |
| Height | 1,454mm57in | 1,483mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,640mm104in | 2,762mm109in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,565mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,531mm60in | 1,562mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 404L | 477L |
| Max trunk volume | 883L | 511L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 211g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S40 II Facelift 2007 2.5 T5: Power / Torque
- Renault Latitude 3.0 V6 dCi: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-5,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | 3,750 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.5 s | 28.0 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 99 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 230 hp 172 kW |
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | 240 hp 179 kW |
Renault Latitude 3.0 V6 dCi has 10 hp more than Volvo S40 II Facelift 2007 2.5 T5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S40 II Facelift 2007 2.5 T5 and Renault Latitude 3.0 V6 dCi: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 1,485 kg 3,274 lb |
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | 234 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 7.2 s |
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | 7.6 s |
Although Renault Latitude 3.0 V6 dCi has more power, Volvo S40 II Facelift 2007 2.5 T5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S40 II Facelift 2007 2.5 T5 and Renault Latitude 3.0 V6 dCi: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Latitude 3.0 V6 dCi and Volvo S40 II Facelift 2007 2.5 T5: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | 139 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 689 km 428 mi |
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | 972 km 604 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 230 hp 172 kW | 7.2 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | 240 hp 179 kW | 7.6 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 |
| 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Renault Latitude 3.0 V6 dCi is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | 139 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 230 hp 172 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,485 kg 3,274 lb | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 689 km 428 mi | 972 km 604 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 211 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 404 L 14.3 cu ft | 477 L 16.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 139 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S40 II Facelift 2007 2.5 T5 | Renault Latitude 3.0 V6 dCi |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.75 LC100 km | 12.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.35 LC100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,363 LC/year | 1,890 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S40 II Facelift 2007 2.5 T5
- Is 245 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Renault Latitude 3.0 V6 dCi
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 130 Nm more
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 283 km (176 mi) more estimated range
- Has 73 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























