Volvo S40 II
Car comparison
Volvo S40 II 2.5vsVolvo S40 II · Facelift 2007 2.5 T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S40 II · Facelift 2007
2.5 T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S40 II 2.5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,403 kg3,093 lb
- Best power-to-weight157 hp/t117 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk404 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best practicality score71/100
Volvo S40 II Facelift 2007 2.5 T5
- Most powerful230 hp172 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.5 L/100 km17.4 mpg US20.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions211 g/km
- Best estimated range689 km428 mi
- Best economy score83/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS40 II2.5 | VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220hp164kW | 230hp172kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,403kg3,093lb | 1,485kg3,274lb |
| Gross weight | 1,960kg4,321lb | 1,960kg4,321lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 63.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 63.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.6s Calculated | 25.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.7L/100 km17.2mpg US20.6mpg UK | 13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 157hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated | 155hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 228Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 660km410mi Calculated | 689km428mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,521cc154cu in | 2,521cc154cu in |
| Length | 4,468mm176in | 4,476mm176in |
| Width | 1,770mm70in | 1,770mm70in |
| Height | 1,452mm57in | 1,454mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,640mm104in | 2,640mm104in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,535mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,531mm60in | 1,531mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 404L | 404L |
| Max trunk volume | 883L | 883L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 62L |
| CO2 emissions | 224g/km | 211g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S40 II 2.5: Power / Torque
- Volvo S40 II Facelift 2007 2.5 T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,800 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-5,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS40 II2.5 | VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.6 s | 25.5 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 99 mph | 160 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 | 220 hp 164 kW |
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 230 hp 172 kW |
Volvo S40 II Facelift 2007 2.5 T5 has 10 hp more than Volvo S40 II 2.5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S40 II 2.5 and Volvo S40 II Facelift 2007 2.5 T5: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 | 1,403 kg 3,093 lb |
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 1,485 kg 3,274 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 | 7.2 s |
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 7.2 s |
Although Volvo S40 II Facelift 2007 2.5 T5 has more power, Volvo S40 II 2.5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 | 660 km 410 mi |
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 689 km 428 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 | 220 hp 164 kW | 7.2 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 230 hp 172 kW | 7.2 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 |
| 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo S40 II Facelift 2007 2.5 T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS40 II2.5 | VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp 164 kW | 230 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,403 kg 3,093 lb | 1,485 kg 3,274 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 660 km 410 mi | 689 km 428 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 224 g/km | 211 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 404 L 14.3 cu ft | 404 L 14.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S40 II 2.5 | Volvo S40 II Facelift 2007 2.5 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK | 9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km | 15.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi | 25.35 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal | 1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year | 2,363 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S40 II 2.5
- Is 82 kg lighter
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo S40 II Facelift 2007 2.5 T5
- Has 10 hp more
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 29 km (18 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 13 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























