Volvo S40 II
Car comparison
Volvo S40 II 2.5vsVolvo S80 · Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S80 · Facelift 2003
2.5T 20V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S40 II 2.5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful220 hp164 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,403 kg3,093 lb
- Best power-to-weight157 hp/t117 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best economy score82/100
Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V
- Lowest city consumption13.0 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk440 L
- Best practicality score73/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS40 II2.5 | VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220hp164kW | 210hp157kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,403kg3,093lb | 1,530kg3,373lb |
| Gross weight | 1,960kg4,321lb | 2,080kg4,586lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 63.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 66.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.6s Calculated | 26.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.7L/100 km17.2mpg US20.6mpg UK | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 157hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 228Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated | 209Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 660km410mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,521cc154cu in | 2,521cc154cu in |
| Length | 4,468mm176in | 4,822mm190in |
| Width | 1,770mm70in | 1,832mm72in |
| Height | 1,452mm57in | 1,434mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,640mm104in | 2,791mm110in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,562mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,531mm60in | 1,560mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 404L | 440L |
| Max trunk volume | 883L | 1,106L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | 224g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S40 II 2.5: Power / Torque
- Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,800 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 5,000 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS40 II2.5 | VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.6 s | 26.4 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 99 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 | 220 hp 164 kW |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 210 hp 157 kW |
Volvo S40 II 2.5 has 10 hp more than Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V and Volvo S40 II 2.5: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 | 1,403 kg 3,093 lb |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 | 7.2 s |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 7.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S40 II 2.5 and Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 | 220 hp 164 kW | 7.2 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 210 hp 157 kW | 7.3 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS40 II2.5 | VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp 164 kW | 210 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,403 kg 3,093 lb | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 660 km 410 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 224 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 404 L 14.3 cu ft | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S40 II 2.5 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S40 II 2.5
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 127 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V
- Has 36 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























