Alfa Romeo 156 (932) · Facelift 2003
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo 156 (932) · Facelift 2003 2.5 i V6 24VvsVolvo S80 · Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S80 · Facelift 2003
2.5T 20V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V
- Most powerful210 hp157 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight137 hp/t102 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption13.0 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Largest trunk440 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best practicality score73/100
Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Facelift 2003 2.5 i V6 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,405 kg3,097 lb
- Best economy score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 192hp143kW | 210hp157kW |
| Torque | 218Nm161lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,405kg3,097lb | 1,530kg3,373lb |
| Gross weight | 1,820kg4,012lb | 2,080kg4,586lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.4s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 66.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.4s Calculated | 26.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.5L/100 km13.4mpg US16.1mpg UK | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 155Nm/t104lb-ft/ton Calculated | 209Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 534km332mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,492cc152cu in | 2,521cc154cu in |
| Length | 4,435mm175in | 4,822mm190in |
| Width | 1,745mm69in | 1,832mm72in |
| Height | 1,430mm56in | 1,434mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,595mm102in | 2,791mm110in |
| Front track | 1,511mm59in | 1,562mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,498mm59in | 1,560mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 378L | 440L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,106L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 80L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Facelift 2003 2.5 i V6 24V: Power / Torque
- Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | 6,300 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 5,000 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.4 s | 26.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | 192 hp 143 kW |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 210 hp 157 kW |
Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V has 18 hp more than Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Facelift 2003 2.5 i V6 24V.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Facelift 2003 2.5 i V6 24V and Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V: 18 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | 218 Nm 161 lb-ft |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | 7.3 s |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 7.3 s |
Although Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V has more power, Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Facelift 2003 2.5 i V6 24V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.3 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 210 hp 157 kW | 7.3 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo156 (932)Facelift 20032.5 i V6 24V | VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 192 hp 143 kW | 210 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 218 Nm 161 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 534 km 332 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 378 L 13.3 cu ft | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Facelift 2003 2.5 i V6 24V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.23 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,098 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo 156 (932) Facelift 2003 2.5 i V6 24V
- Is 125 kg lighter
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V
- Has 18 hp more
- Has 102 Nm more
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 62 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























