Volkswagen Phaeton Long · Facelift 2010
Car comparison
Volkswagen Phaeton Long · Facelift 2010 3.0 V6 TDIvsRenault Latitude 3.0 V6 dCi
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Latitude
3.0 V6 dCi
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Latitude 3.0 V6 dCi
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Lightest1,730 kg3,814 lb
- Best power-to-weight139 hp/t103 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.0 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score87/100
Volkswagen Phaeton Long Facelift 2010 3.0 V6 TDI
- Fastest top speed237 km/h147 mph
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Best estimated range1,059 km658 mi
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best practicality score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI | RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,240kg4,938lb | 1,730kg3,814lb |
| Gross weight | 2,830kg6,239lb | 2,250kg4,960lb |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 88.1s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 69.9s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.6s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.7s Calculated | 28.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.2s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 107hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 139hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 223Nm/t149lb-ft/ton Calculated | 260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,059km658mi Calculated | 972km604mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,967cc181cu in | 2,998cc183cu in |
| Length | 5,179mm204in | 4,897mm193in |
| Width | 1,903mm75in | 1,832mm72in |
| Height | 1,450mm57in | 1,483mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 3,001mm118in | 2,762mm109in |
| Front track | 1,630mm64in | 1,565mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,617mm64in | 1,562mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 120mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 477L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 511L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Phaeton Long Facelift 2010 3.0 V6 TDI: Power / Torque
- Renault Latitude 3.0 V6 dCi: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | 3,750 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI | RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.2 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.6 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.7 s | 28.0 s |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.3 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.7 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI | 240 hp 179 kW |
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | 240 hp 179 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI | 2,240 kg 4,938 lb |
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | 234 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI | 8.6 s |
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Latitude 3.0 V6 dCi and Volkswagen Phaeton Long Facelift 2010 3.0 V6 TDI: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Latitude 3.0 V6 dCi and Volkswagen Phaeton Long Facelift 2010 3.0 V6 TDI: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp |
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | 139 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI | 1,059 km 658 mi |
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | 972 km 604 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI | 240 hp 179 kW | 8.6 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | 240 hp 179 kW | 7.6 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI |
| 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Renault Latitude 3.0 V6 dCi is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | 139 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenPhaeton LongFacelift 20103.0 V6 TDI | RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.6 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,240 kg 4,938 lb | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,059 km 658 mi | 972 km 604 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 477 L 16.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 139 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Phaeton Long Facelift 2010 3.0 V6 TDI | Renault Latitude 3.0 V6 dCi |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.88 LC100 km | 12.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.94 LC100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,231 LC/year | 1,890 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Phaeton Long Facelift 2010 3.0 V6 TDI
- Has 50 Nm more
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 87 km (54 mi) more estimated range
- Has 23 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Renault Latitude 3.0 V6 dCi
- Is 510 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 32 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























