Car comparison

Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0vsNissan Teana II 3.5i V6 24V

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mitsubishi Lancer IX

Ralliart 2.0

240 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2009-2011
VS

Nissan Teana II

3.5i V6 24V

249 hp3498 ccGasolineFWDNaturally aspiratedSedan2008-2013

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.0 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,365 kg
    3,009 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    176 hp/t
    131 kW/t
    5.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.4 L/100 km
    28.0 mpg US
    33.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.5 L/100 km
    22.4 mpg US
    26.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.4 L/100 km
    36.8 mpg US
    44.1 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    702 km
    436 mi
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best performance score
    56/100
  • Best economy score
    84/100
  • Best practicality score
    78/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V
Power
240hp179kW
249hp186kW
Torque
309Nm228lb-ft
326Nm240lb-ft
Curb weight
1,365kg3,009lb
1,581kg3,486lb
Gross weight
1,850kg4,079lb
2,060kg4,542lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
61.4s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
60.2s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.0s
7.2s
0-200 km/h
23.6s
Calculated
28.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.7s
Calculated
6.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK
13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.9s
Calculated
15.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
176hp/t131kW/t80hp/1000 lb
Calculated
157hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton
Calculated
206Nm/t138lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
702km436mi
Calculated
686km426mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
3,498cc213cu in
Length
4,570mm180in
4,850mm191in
Width
1,760mm69in
1,800mm71in
Height
1,505mm59in
1,480mm58in
Wheelbase
2,635mm104in
2,775mm109in
Front track
1,530mm60in
1,550mm61in
Rear track
1,530mm60in
1,550mm61in
Trunk volume-
488L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
59L
70L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0Nissan Teana II 3.5i V6 24VPowerTorque
  • Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Nissan Teana II 3.5i V6 24V: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.06,000 rpm3,500 rpm6,250 rpm
NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V6,000 rpm4,400 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.7 s
6.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.0 s
7.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.6 s
28.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.7 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.9 s
15.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
163 km/h
101 mph
158 km/h
98 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
240 hp
179 kW
NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V
249 hp
186 kW

Nissan Teana II 3.5i V6 24V has 9 hp more than Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0 and Nissan Teana II 3.5i V6 24V: 9 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
309 Nm
228 lb-ft
NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V
326 Nm
240 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
1,365 kg
3,009 lb
NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V
1,581 kg
3,486 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.07.0 s
NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V7.2 s

Although Nissan Teana II 3.5i V6 24V has more power, Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0 and Nissan Teana II 3.5i V6 24V: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0 and Nissan Teana II 3.5i V6 24V: 1.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
176 hp/t
131 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V
157 hp/t
117 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
702 km
436 mi
NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V
686 km
426 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
240 hp
179 kW
7.0 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V
249 hp
186 kW
7.2 s
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,570 mm
179.9 in
Height
1,505 mm
59.3 in
NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V
Power
249 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
488 L
17.2 cu ft
Length
4,850 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,480 mm
58.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V
Power
249 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK

Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
7.0 s
NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
7.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
176 hp/t
131 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V
157 hp/t
117 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V
Power
240 hp
179 kW
249 hp
186 kW
Torque
309 Nm
228 lb-ft
326 Nm
240 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.0 s
7.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
1,365 kg
3,009 lb
1,581 kg
3,486 lb
Fuel consumption
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,570 mm
179.9 in
Height
1,505 mm
59.3 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
488 L
17.2 cu ft
Length
4,850 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,480 mm
58.3 in
Range score
702 km
436 mi
686 km
426 mi
Trunk score
-
488 L
17.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
176 hp/t
131 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
157 hp/t
117 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0Nissan Teana II 3.5i V6 24V
Consumption8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.70 LC100 km17.85 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.66 LC100 mi28.73 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,205 LC/year2,678 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0

  • Is 216 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 16 km (10 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power

Nissan Teana II 3.5i V6 24V

  • Has 9 hp more
  • Has 17 Nm more

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0
Nissan Teana II 3.5i V6 24V
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Ralliart 2.0
2.0 T5
VS
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0vsVolvoS60 II2.0 T5
3.5i V6 24V
3.5 i V6
VS
NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24VvsNissanTeana3.5 i V6
Ralliart 2.0
2.0
VS
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
3.5i V6 24V
3.3i V6 24V
VS
NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24VvsHyundaiGenesis3.3i V6 24V
Ralliart 2.0
3.5 V6
VS
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0vsRenaultLatitude3.5 V6
3.5i V6 24V
2.5T
VS
NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24VvsNissanCedric (Y34)2.5T
Ralliart 2.0
2.5 T5
VS
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0vsVolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5
3.5i V6 24V
3.5 V6
VS
NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24VvsToyotaCamry VII (XV50)3.5 V6
Ralliart 2.0
3.3 V6
VS
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0vsHyundaiSonata V (NF)Facelift 20083.3 V6
Ralliart 2.0
3.2 V6 FSI
VS
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0vsVolkswagenPassat (B6)3.2 V6 FSI
Ralliart 2.0
2.5 GT
VS
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0vsSubaruLegacy V2.5 GT
Ralliart 2.0
3.2 JTS V6
VS
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0vsAlfa Romeo1593.2 JTS V6
Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0 vs Nissan Teana II 3.5i V6 24V - car comparison - FastVsFaster