Car comparison

Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0vsVolvo S40 II · Facelift 2007 2.5 T5

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mitsubishi Lancer IX

Ralliart 2.0

240 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2009-2011
VS

Volvo S40 II · Facelift 2007

2.5 T5

230 hp2521 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2011-2012

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.0 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    240 hp
    179 kW
  • Lightest
    1,365 kg
    3,009 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    176 hp/t
    131 kW/t
    5.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.4 L/100 km
    28.0 mpg US
    33.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.5 L/100 km
    22.4 mpg US
    26.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.4 L/100 km
    36.8 mpg US
    44.1 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    702 km
    436 mi
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best performance score
    56/100
  • Best economy score
    84/100
  • Best practicality score
    78/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5
Power
240hp179kW
230hp172kW
Torque
309Nm228lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,365kg3,009lb
1,485kg3,274lb
Gross weight
1,850kg4,079lb
1,960kg4,321lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
235 km/h
146 mph
To 99% top speed
61.4s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
63.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.0s
7.2s
0-200 km/h
23.6s
Calculated
25.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.7s
Calculated
6.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK
13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.9s
Calculated
15.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
176hp/t131kW/t80hp/1000 lb
Calculated
155hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton
Calculated
215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
702km436mi
Calculated
689km428mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
2,521cc154cu in
Length
4,570mm180in
4,476mm176in
Width
1,760mm69in
1,770mm70in
Height
1,505mm59in
1,454mm57in
Wheelbase
2,635mm104in
2,640mm104in
Front track
1,530mm60in
1,535mm60in
Rear track
1,530mm60in
1,531mm60in
Trunk volume-
404L
Max trunk volume-
883L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
59L
62L
CO2 emissions-
211g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0Volvo S40 II Facelift 2007 2.5 T5PowerTorque
  • Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Volvo S40 II Facelift 2007 2.5 T5: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.06,000 rpm3,500 rpm6,250 rpm
VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T55,000 rpm1,500-5,000 rpm5,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.7 s
6.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.0 s
7.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.6 s
25.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
235 km/h
146 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.7 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.9 s
15.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
163 km/h
101 mph
160 km/h
99 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
240 hp
179 kW
VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5
230 hp
172 kW

Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0 has 10 hp more than Volvo S40 II Facelift 2007 2.5 T5.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo S40 II Facelift 2007 2.5 T5 and Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
309 Nm
228 lb-ft
VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
1,365 kg
3,009 lb
VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5
1,485 kg
3,274 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5
235 km/h
146 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.07.0 s
VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T57.2 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0 and Volvo S40 II Facelift 2007 2.5 T5: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5
9.0 L/100 km
26.1 mpg US
31.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0 and Volvo S40 II Facelift 2007 2.5 T5: 0.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
176 hp/t
131 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5
155 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
702 km
436 mi
VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5
689 km
428 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
240 hp
179 kW
7.0 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5
230 hp
172 kW
7.2 s
235 km/h
146 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,570 mm
179.9 in
Height
1,505 mm
59.3 in
VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5
Power
230 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
404 L
14.3 cu ft
Length
4,476 mm
176.2 in
Height
1,454 mm
57.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5
Power
230 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
9.0 L/100 km
26.1 mpg US
31.4 mpg UK

Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
7.0 s
VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5
9.0 L/100 km
26.1 mpg US
31.4 mpg UK
7.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
176 hp/t
131 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5
155 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
9.0 L/100 km
26.1 mpg US
31.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5
Power
240 hp
179 kW
230 hp
172 kW
Torque
309 Nm
228 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.0 s
7.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
Lightness
1,365 kg
3,009 lb
1,485 kg
3,274 lb
Fuel consumption
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
9.0 L/100 km
26.1 mpg US
31.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,570 mm
179.9 in
Height
1,505 mm
59.3 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
404 L
14.3 cu ft
Length
4,476 mm
176.2 in
Height
1,454 mm
57.2 in
Range score
702 km
436 mi
689 km
428 mi
CO2 score
-
211 g/km
Trunk score
-
404 L
14.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
176 hp/t
131 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
155 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0Volvo S40 II Facelift 2007 2.5 T5
Consumption8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.70 LC100 km15.75 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.66 LC100 mi25.35 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,205 LC/year2,363 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Is 120 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 13 km (8 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0
Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Ralliart 2.0
2.0 T5
VS
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0vsVolvoS60 II2.0 T5
2.5 T5
2.5
VS
VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5vsVolvoS40 II2.5
Ralliart 2.0
2.0
VS
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
Ralliart 2.0
3.5i V6 24V
VS
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0vsNissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V
2.5 T5
2.4 D5
VS
VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5vsVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
Ralliart 2.0
3.5 V6
VS
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0vsRenaultLatitude3.5 V6
2.5 T5
2.4i T5 20V
VS
VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5vsVolvoS602.4i T5 20V
Ralliart 2.0
3.3 V6
VS
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0vsHyundaiSonata V (NF)Facelift 20083.3 V6
Ralliart 2.0
3.2 V6 FSI
VS
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0vsVolkswagenPassat (B6)3.2 V6 FSI
2.5 T5
2.0 D5
VS
VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5vsVolvoS902.0 D5
Ralliart 2.0
2.5 GT
VS
MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0vsSubaruLegacy V2.5 GT
2.5 T5
2.5T 20V
VS
VolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5vsVolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V
Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0 vs Volvo S40 II · Facelift 2007 2.5 T5 - car comparison - FastVsFaster